Its not a legal technicality, its an environmental bottom line that provides clarity, certainty and efficiency to the issue of non-point source discharges. Farmers including me, had to apply for resource consents to farm for almost a decade. Why should Southland farmers not be required to internalize the costs of their externalities? Why should those who degrade the quality of the right (to clean rivers) of others not be required to gain permission to do so and be tied to enforceable consent conditions like those of us in canterbury? My only gripe is that farming activities should not be singled out. Golf courses, equestrian activities, and residential areas with lawns and gardens should also have to have enforceable and monitored discharge consents. That would remove the cilurrent justifiable criticism of picking on farmers. https://lnkd.in/gyTSHcHb