On February 14, Matthew Tanner will participate in a panel at the Institute for Energy Law’s 76th Annual Energy Law Conference. The session will cover the use of offshore wind and carbon capture and storage as next steps in decarbonization, regulatory and legal hurdles, and incentives to help accelerate the industry’s investments. BRG is a proud sponsor of the conference. Learn more >>> https://lnkd.in/gkMWWBCF
BRG’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
23rd Annual Energy Litigation Conference - Nov. 12 𝗦𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁: Regulatory Update - How Regulations are Affecting New and Existing Energy Projects Onshore and Offshore, with Mark McDaniel of Devon Energy, Mike Raab of EOG Resources, and Jennifer Brand Stockel of Equinor, moderated by Logan Johnson of Hicks Johnson PLLC. Register now to take advantage of early bird pricing (available through October 22): https://lnkd.in/dnF-3CNq Over the past year several new and amended federal regulations have been promulgated causing a ripple effect on the energy industry both onshore and offshore. This panel will discuss a sampling of these regulations including topics such as: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reform, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM) strengthened financial assurance requirements for offshore lessees due to decommissioning obligations, and the Inflation Reduction Act’s federal onshore and offshore lease sale requirements. For the full conference schedule, visit: https://lnkd.in/dQE7jTee #2024EnergyLitigation #EnergyLaw #Litigation #Regulatory #CLE
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
In Energy Transfer, LP et al v. Culberson Midstream LLC et al, Judge Whitehill ruled that cases filed before September 1, 2024, are not removable to the new Texas Business Court, a key development under HB 19. For a breakdown of this ruling and its implications for future cases, check out my colleague Charlie Sartain's post on Energy & the Law here: https://lnkd.in/gCB3p3z6
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
In Energy Transfer, LP et al v. Culberson Midstream LLC et al, Judge Whitehill ruled that cases filed before September 1, 2024, are not removable to the new Texas Business Court, a key development under HB 19. For a breakdown of this ruling and its implications for future cases, check out my colleague Charlie Sartain's post on Energy & the Law here: https://lnkd.in/gaFD7KpQ
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
In Energy Transfer, LP et al v. Culberson Midstream LLC et al, Judge Whitehill ruled that cases filed before September 1, 2024, are not removable to the new Texas Business Court, a key development under HB 19. For a breakdown of this ruling and its implications for future cases, check out my colleague Charlie Sartain's post on Energy & the Law here: https://lnkd.in/gNpuX_K5
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
In Energy Transfer, LP et al v. Culberson Midstream LLC et al, Judge Whitehill ruled that cases filed before September 1, 2024, are not removable to the new Texas Business Court, a key development under HB 19. For a breakdown of this ruling and its implications for future cases, check out my colleague Charlie Sartain's post on Energy & the Law here: https://lnkd.in/gCB3p3z6
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
In United States v. Osage Wind LLC, a federal court in Oklahoma has granted a decision, granting permanent injunctive relief and ordering the ejectment of a wind turbine farm. Get insights into the legal intricacies and implications of this case in the latest post by my colleague Charlie Sartain on Energy & the Law.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In Energy Transfer, LP et al v. Culberson Midstream LLC et al, Judge Whitehill ruled that cases filed before September 1, 2024, are not removable to the new Texas Business Court, a key development under HB 19. For a breakdown of this ruling and its implications for future cases, check out my colleague Charlie Sartain's post on Energy & the Law here: https://lnkd.in/gTy2SF-q
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
In Energy Transfer, LP et al v. Culberson Midstream LLC et al, Judge Whitehill ruled that cases filed before September 1, 2024, are not removable to the new Texas Business Court, a key development under HB 19. For a breakdown of this ruling and its implications for future cases, check out my colleague Charlie Sartain's post on Energy & the Law here: https://lnkd.in/gJmwneSP
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
In Energy Transfer, LP et al v. Culberson Midstream LLC et al, Judge Whitehill ruled that cases filed before September 1, 2024, are not removable to the new Texas Business Court, a key development under HB 19. For a breakdown of this ruling and its implications for future cases, check out my colleague Charlie Sartain's post on Energy & the Law here: https://lnkd.in/gQEYv6sY
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
In Energy Transfer, LP et al v. Culberson Midstream LLC et al, Judge Whitehill ruled that cases filed before September 1, 2024, are not removable to the new Texas Business Court, a key development under HB 19. For a breakdown of this ruling and its implications for future cases, check out my colleague Charlie Sartain's post on Energy & the Law here: https://lnkd.in/gMvDaDjR
To view or add a comment, sign in
-