Cellectis’ Post

Here our new paper on TALE base editing!!

If you want to hear more about our scientific collaboration with Namrata Gundiah and Aritra Chatterjee, as well as the genesis of our recent work published in Development, here is the link to our interview for the "People behind the papers" section of the issue. For me, this was a nice way to talk about our research, the ups and downs that we had to deal with, and the long journey that was undertaken to publish this work. https://lnkd.in/dMw_PsNQ

Preserve the integrity of science. You can volunteer to check post publication papers. (Should have done a better job of peer review pre-publication). (Maybe peer reviewers were too close to researchers.)

Count Down! 3 Days to go to experience the 4th Annual Scientific Roundtable Series! Mark your calendar because it surely will be enlightening and full of insights. #CIHPScientificRoundtableSeries

The new JBI EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION editorial offers insight into the potential of #implementation science, exploring the complexities and interdisciplinary nature of this evolving field. https://lnkd.in/gXJGnQ6T

🚀 New Paper Published! We compared the current international guidelines on #PrematureEjaculation, revealing differences in definitions and management recommendations. This analysis is crucial to bridging knowledge gaps and promoting future studies, aiming to develop a shared definition and standardized diagnostic-therapeutic algorithms. 🧠 Dive into our latest work! https://lnkd.in/dtMpSPyS #Research #SexualHealth #Guidelines Marco De Sio, Riccardo Autorino MD PhD, Javier Romero-Otero, Davide Arcaniolo, Lorenzo Spirito, Carmelo Quattrone, Savio Domenico Pandolfo, Biagio Barone, Francesco Ditonno

It's the first #EJP Editor's Choice article of August! While digital self-management interventions for chronic pain appear promising in improving well-being and functioning in target populations, it is unclear how the development and evaluation processes were structured and how implementation was planned and executed. This systematic review provides insights into implementation frameworks used to guide and evaluate scientific innovation in chronic pain. Four bibliography databases (Medline, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL) and two registries (PubMed Central, MedaRxiv) were systematically searched. Learn about the results here: https://lnkd.in/dKGtCZwz

Are you interested in helping shape NIA’s scientific priorities? NIA has recently published a request for information to generate ideas for NIA’s 2026 – 2030 Strategic Directions! Insights from researchers, industries, stakeholder organizations, other federal agencies, and the public are welcome until Sept. 13, 2024. Learn more from the NIA blog: https://lnkd.in/eNgBudBE #NIABlog #NIHAging #RFI #StrategicDirections #NIAWhereResearchComesOfAge

Elated to announce our recent publication! This research focuses on the comparison of trans-femoral vs. trans-carotid TAVR access for the patient of TAVR. TF-TAVR is considered as gold standard technique, but alternative access sites have been used, especially when TF-TAVR approach is contraindicated in fewer instances. TC-TAVR access, which is concurrently being considered as the primary substitute of TF-TAVR. The current evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of TC-TAVR with TF-TAVR is limited. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a robust comparison between the two techniques.

This is a must read blog post from Dorothy Bishop "Now you see it, now you don't: the strange world of disappearing Special Issues at MDPI" https://buff.ly/47lKFRO Dorothy, please turn this into a peer reviewed article. I recently published an article on OMICS (https://buff.ly/3SeUs5I). I did this, so that what I said/thought was validated by others and it now is available in the scientific archive forever. I believe that we: 1️⃣ Need to ensure that evidence such as this is reported in the peer reviewed literature. 2️⃣ That it deserves to be validated by peer review so that we know that others have looked at it and agree that what is being reported is robust.