Vista Energy (REV) assessed a disgorgement of $1,670,000 and a civil penalty of $1,000,000 for #NERC violations. For more details, read here: https://hubs.la/Q02M10Qv0
Certrec’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
💷 Why is the term of the contract so important? 💷 Usually brokers are motivated to sell longer-term contracts and they are more appealing to them because the commission is multiplied by the length of the contract, usually representing a larger claim amount. See how much you could be owed in three easy steps: https://ow.ly/x3GI50Ruz3f #misselling #energybrokers #businessenergy #energylitigation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
💷 Why is the term of the contract so important? 💷 Usually brokers are motivated to sell longer-term contracts and they are more appealing to them because the commission is multiplied by the length of the contract, usually representing a larger claim amount. See how much you could be owed in three easy steps: https://ow.ly/ikNL50R9hQp #misselling #energybrokers #businessenergy #energylitigation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
💷 Why is the term of the contract so important? 💷 Usually brokers are motivated to sell longer-term contracts and they are more appealing to them because the commission is multiplied by the length of the contract, usually representing a larger claim amount. See how much you could be owed in three easy steps: https://ow.ly/eMSK50S5C7M #misselling #energybrokers #businessenergy #energylitigation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
💷 Why is the term of the contract so important? 💷 Usually brokers are motivated to sell longer-term contracts and they are more appealing to them because the commission is multiplied by the length of the contract, usually representing a larger claim amount. See how much you could be owed in three easy steps: https://ow.ly/x3GI50Ruz3f #misselling #energybrokers #businessenergy #energylitigation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
💷 Why is the term of the contract so important? 💷 Usually brokers are motivated to sell longer-term contracts and they are more appealing to them because the commission is multiplied by the length of the contract, usually representing a larger claim amount. See how much you could be owed in three easy steps: https://ow.ly/KOeF50SYkvZ #misselling #energybrokers #businessenergy #energylitigation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
💷 Why is the term of the contract so important? 💷 Usually brokers are motivated to sell longer-term contracts and they are more appealing to them because the commission is multiplied by the length of the contract, usually representing a larger claim amount. See how much you could be owed in three easy steps: https://ow.ly/KOeF50SYkvZ #misselling #energybrokers #businessenergy #energylitigation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
John McCaffrey and Harvey Reiter authored an article for Law360 examining recent court decisions that have the potential to increase competition between independent transmission providers and franchised public utilities. The attorneys say the cumulative effect of the cases is likely to have implications beyond the borders of the states where the cases were decided. #FERC #EnergyLaw #RenewableEnergy #UtilitiesLaw #PublicUtilities
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
💷 Why is the term of the contract so important? 💷 Usually brokers are motivated to sell longer-term contracts and they are more appealing to them because the commission is multiplied by the length of the contract, usually representing a larger claim amount. See how much you could be owed in three easy steps: https://ow.ly/iOn150Syyz5 #misselling #energybrokers #businessenergy #energylitigation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
⚖️ Start your claim ⚖️ Start your claim today by contacting us today and requesting a call back to discuss your claim in more detail. See how much you could be owed in three easy steps: https://ow.ly/8W4u50SyyES #misselling #energybrokers #businessenergy #energylitigation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Can we talk about this? The states supporting FERC's Order No. 1920 assert that the outcome of the order "will be a lower delivered cost of energy for the ratepayers of our States." How would someone go about proving (or refuting) that claim? More broadly, is FERC held to any standard of proof when it issues sweeping orders under section 206 of the Federal Power Act (like with 1920)? https://lnkd.in/ebtuVBea
To view or add a comment, sign in