I see that The Sun, our Premier and the talking heads at EnergyNow are saying that Oil and Gas are being muzzled!
Here is a summary. There is zero mention of oil and gas companies, so our Premier, The Sun and EnergyNow, simply say that Oil and Gas want the leeway to lie without repercussions. I think the oil and gas companies will be fine with this Bill.
https://lnkd.in/gAqMyKgu
Excerpt...
Representations of a product’s benefits for the environment
If someone engages in “reviewable conduct” as defined in the Competition Act, then the Commissioner of Competition can apply to the Competition Tribunal, the Federal Court and/or the superior court of a province, for a binding civil order to address that conduct. The order can include prohibitions on taking certain actions, requirements to take certain actions, or an administrative monetary penalty, depending on the circumstances. The amendments would add, to the existing section dealing with representations to the public, a new form of reviewable conduct: a statement, warranty or guarantee of a product’s benefits for protecting the environment or mitigating the environmental and ecological effect of climate change that is not based on an adequate and proper test.
This amendment has the potential to engage the freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the Charter, because it would allow for legally binding orders on persons, as a consequence for making certain kinds of statements to the public about a product. Section 2(b) includes protection for advertising and other expression that is done for commercial purposes.
The following considerations support the consistency of this amendment with the Charter. Commercial expression that has the potential to mislead the public has a lower value compared to other forms of protected expression, because it has a weaker link to the core values of the right. The proposed amendment would seek to protect consumers, competitors, and the proper functioning of the market, against the harms of untested representations about a product’s benefits for protecting the environment or mitigating the effects of climate change. Requiring persons to adequately test their environmental claims improves the functioning of the market by improving the reliability of information provided to consumers and preventing persons from relying on untested claims to gain a market advantage. The amendment would not impose a requirement that testing prove the representation with absolute certainty. Instead, it requires “adequate and proper” testing of the claim. Furthermore, the amendment would not establish a criminal offence: if a person is found to have engaged in reviewable conduct for the purpose of this amendment, only civil or administrative proceedings would be available.
Lawyer
1moNot everyone agrees that the progression of the Treaty Principles Bill is pointless. I’m rather looking forward to it personally. We should encouraging engagement, rather than offering excuses not to have a debate.