Clive Pugh’s Post

View profile for Clive Pugh, graphic

Pensions Partner and Head of Pensions Regulatory Investigations at Burges Salmon

Following our recent article on the Defined Benefit (DB) Funding and Investment Strategy Regulations (the DB Funding Regulations) (Finally here: The DB Funding and Investment Strategy Regulations - key points and actions (burges-salmon.com) which noted the missing pieces still awaited in relation to the overall DB funding picture, the Pensions Regulator (TPR) on Tuesday issued its Statement of Strategy (SoS) consultation. Firstly to recap, the DB Funding Regulations require that trustees submit a SoS, alongside their actuarial valuation, as part of planning and managing their defined benefit scheme funding. It “forms part of a package of legislative and regulatory measures designed to improve the security and sustainability of defined benefit (DB) pension schemes.”. The DB Funding Regulations provide that the SoS will be divided into two parts: (1) the headline funding and investment strategy (the FIS); and (2) supplementary matters, including the trustees’ assessment of how successfully the FIS is being implemented and related risks, actuarial information, including a summary of the actuarial valuation and investment information relating to the current investment strategy. Regulation 18 of the DB Funding Regulations requires the SoS to be submitted in a form as set out by TPR. As part of its consultation, TPR is proposing that:- The SoS should be in a standard form and follow a set template (as provided for by Regulation 18), which TPR has provided in order “to make this process easier for trustees and to remove some of the compliance risk”; It will produce separate templates to reflect that schemes will have to provide slightly different information depending on whether they have reached the ‘relevant date’, or whether they are taking a Fast Track or Bespoke approach. It will request less information from smaller schemes in acknowledgement that it is likely the effort and costs of complying is likely to be much larger for such schemes when viewed as a percentage of their overall pension assets or liabilities. TPR is looking to confirm through the consultation whether:- Institute of Directors (IoD) IPEBLA Burges Salmon LLP #bbc @apl #pensions #finance

The Pensions Regulator issues its consultation on the Statement of Strategy for DB schemes – another piece of the slowly forming DB funding jigsaw… (via Passle)

The Pensions Regulator issues its consultation on the Statement of Strategy for DB schemes – another piece of the slowly forming DB funding jigsaw… (via Passle)

blog.burges-salmon.com

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics