ComputerWeekly.com’s Post

ComputerWeekly.com reposted this

The cost of the #PostOfficeScandal to UK taxpayers mounts, how much will Fujitsu pay? https://lnkd.in/dGtkf7Jq

Post Office and Fujitsu malevolence and incompetence means huge final taxpayers’ bill | Computer Weekly

Post Office and Fujitsu malevolence and incompetence means huge final taxpayers’ bill | Computer Weekly

computerweekly.com

James Arbuthnot

Member, Horizon Compensation Advisory Board

1mo

Fujitsu did more than “miss an opportunity to take action to prevent subpostmasters from being convicted“. Knowing of the weaknesses in Horizon, they were actively complicit in assisting those prosecutions with false evidence.

Andy Jenkinson

CEO CIP. Fellow Cyber Theory Institute. Director Fintech & Cyber Security Alliance (FITCA) working with Governments. NAMED AN EXPERT IN INTERNET ASSET & DNS VULNERABILITIES

1mo

Even if Fujitsu do pay, that cost will be indirectly paid by tax payers due to reduction of taxes. The whole system is rigged. The tax payers pay a Prime, then pay for the fck ups. Not a single Fujitsu or Post Office Executive will feel any financial burden or pain and Fujitsu will be awarded tens/hundreds of £millions more in gov contracts.

Kevin Haughton

Senior Analyst at iSOFT redundant despite being under the DDA then retired

1mo

Despite all the convoluted excuses used by the PO's unethical lawyers there is one definitive lack of evidence which should be available to any accounting system which the law should use in any prosecution. You have an input which will have a reference and time stamp which was done at the Post masters terminal that transaction should then be transmitted to the PO system with the same reference and time stamp. If that happens you have a system that is accurate. However lots of things can go wrong , lost data packets, corrupted data packets all causing incorrect balances in the POs system. But what proof was there that the postmasters terminal transaction was received by the PO's system? We know they used remote access to try and correct the problems but that too would have a time stamp or should have. The judges were completely knaive to believe money had gone missing there was NO proof .Any forensic accountant would not have been satisfied money had gone missing. In any police enquiry looking at an accounting fraud the missing money is part of the proof and would be looked for. This basic proof was ignored by the judicial system. The legal system is prone to complicating as much as possible what happened ,that's what lawyers do.

Janet Skinner

Ex Postmistress/ health and safety advisor

1mo

Not enough Karl, Or what they pay in money, will probably win back in government contracts

Jane Hamrin

Writer at IT-Kanalen and reporter for Computer Weekly from the Nordics

1mo

Our Post Office here had a postal bank when we were young. Fantastic bank! Well, it was closed and another bank bought it over. I was a client in it. The bank had its own outlets - this was a token. Everyone should go to a bank outlet.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics