Entering Netcracker boosted my motivation to make a significant job a lot. By 2017 I was sure that I wanted to make something significant in terms of numbers, and those numbers should represent people. Like before I was working on a project in collaboration with one scientific institution (for my PhD), which was modeling tidal phenomena to understand if the dam of the St. Petersburg, Russia will withstand the tide. To be honest, the project I participated in was not about the dam or modeling, but just a participation within this organization made me think I can bring some value. I remember this impression of mine for years, this was more than 10 years ago. Working in a corporation does the same. You should understand, what you can bring to this world, if you are motivated to. Financial matter covers the rest, if you are really not into the main product, you probably cover a very significant part of the value stream of your firm, which is being used by your employer to generate its revenue - and your employer pays you some piece of this revenue. And if your employer makes a difference in some valuable domains significant to you, you are involved. Ask your line manager, what is the value you are bringing to the organization and what is the value your organization brings to the world and your community. Here in Netcracker we are delivering mission critical systems to telco. Which each and every person uses to call 911, 112. Telecom brings this easiness to our life every day, when you can call your beloved ones upon request. Part of my team here is to provide some value to development teams (making up their platform on top of k8s and ocp) who are making this product for telco, who are hundreds. Who are making products for hundreds of our customers, who are delivering services to millions and billions of people across the globe. So I'm good.
Pros & Cons Pros ❇️Working in a corporation can provide a sense of purpose, leading to increased engagement, higher retention, and enhanced innovation. Companies like Johnson & Johnson and Patagonia demonstrate these benefits through strong alignment between employee purpose and corporate goals. ❇️Employers generate revenue through employee contributions, sharing this as compensation. Purpose-driven companies often see improved financial performance and employee satisfaction, as seen with Netflix and Johnson Controls. Cons: ✴️If a company hires an employee for a single task without broader opportunities, it can lead to disengagement, wasted talent, and increased turnover. Cases like Enron and a hi-tech service sector company highlight the negative impacts of underutilization and lack of growth avenues. ✴️Assigning high-priced employees to marginal tasks without support can lead to opportunity costs, disengagement, and escalating labor costs. Examples from Mothernode and a multi-national bank show how misallocation of resources can harm profitability and employee morale.
--
3moAwesome work!