🚨Controversial Opinion Alert 🚨
I’ve often thought 🤔 about this rule as I’ve referenced it in my programs.
While I don’t disagree with its general sentiment, I’ve realized limiting human growth and development into these three categories is problematic.
I’ve seen this rule used too often to justify not spending💵 or ⏳on training and development.
Choosing to rely only on experience but failing to equip people with the frameworks, systems, and practices to turn those experiences into growth towards mastery.
A few specific examples of this oversimplification of adult learning:
1️⃣ the 70% experience is actually made up of a few really critical components.
The experience itself AND our reflection 🤔 AND integration ♾️ of that experience into our brains 🧠 and bodies.
It’s not just about the assignment or experience. We’ve all had lots of experiences that we didn’t bother to learn anything from.
It’s much more about what we think about it, feel about it, sense about it, and do with it all. And finally the integration of that wisdom into our brains 🧠 and bodies!
2️⃣ the Coursework and training referred to here (especially in the past) is typically discrete events, reading, obtaining knowledge, and learning skills in a traditional model.
Certainly, this highly ineffective method for long term growth and transformation won’t create learning.
However, when “training” or “exposure to ideas/insights” is integrated into our days/lives. And, we have a system for integrating and actioning it - I’d venture a guess the impact is much greater!
3️⃣ Social learning (from relationships) and exposure to others is highly impactful, even more than 20%.
When we engage with a partner to gain understanding, perspective, feedback, and identify next steps it has a huge impact.
Additionally, our subconscious mind is picking up on all kinds of cues as we interact with others. Tapping into subconscious is much more effective than the effort and energy required to engage our conscious mind in learning.
➡️Also…adult learning is in itself inaccurate because for the most part humans all “learn” or form neural pathways in the same ways regardless of age.
What do you think? Is this model helpful? Or does it over simplify at the expense of potential misinterpretation, oversimplification, or misunderstanding?
#70/20/10 #adultlearning #development #learning #growth
A time-tested guideline for developing managers ⏤ the 70-20-10 rule ⏤ emerged from over 30 years of our Lessons of Experience research, which explores how executives learn, grow, and change over the course of their careers: https://bit.ly/4cNpBVJ