Our paper "Post-analysis of Wisdome Stockholm: a comparative study of building model versus constructed geometry" has been accepted for the IASS 2024 conference next week in Zurich! The paper presents a post-analysis of Wisdome Stockholm, evaluating the accuracy of the built structure against the building model. We also examine the non-developable nature of the beam geometry and analyse internal stress calculations of the timber gridshell. Our goal with this paper was to deepen our understanding of the accuracy of architectural and structural models in complex bent-on-site free-form timber structures. These insights are set to shape the future of timber gridshell construction, driving the evolution of methods and models for even greater precision and reliability in architecture and structural design. Thanks again to the timber team of Wisdome Stockholm for the great collaboration, and shout out to the authors of this paper for pushing the boundaries of timber knowledge: Evy Slabbinck (Design-to-Production), Stefan Rick (SJB Kempter Fitze AG), David Riggenbach (Blumer Lehmann ) and Moritz N. (Design-to-Production) Presentation: Wednesday 28.08.2024, Working group 12, 9:30-11:00 Tekniska museet #designingthefuture #wemastercomplexity
Looking forward having you at #IASS2024!
Or are you refering to the overall shape🤔? Sorry for thinking loud and posting directly:)
Looking forward to it!
Incrível!!!
Having fun to be a pioneer; Unmögliches erledigen wir sofort - Wunder dauern zwei Wochen
2moSadly, I will not be at IASS 2024. However, one point caught my attention: ‘non-developable nature of the beam geometry.’ How is this meant? I strongly assume that the trees initially grew straight, and as I understood the construction principle, the beams were rather bent than milled. Therefore, I would have concluded that the beams must be developable. Am I misunderstanding something? Design-to-Production