DGMT Innovation Fellowship’s Post

The Fellowship team has been using the 'pause' between graduating one cohort and starting the next, to do a number of things. This includes a review of our MERL (Monitoring, Evaluation, Reflection and Learning) processes and systems. Tracey Konstant, who has been working with us on this, has helped us to weave together the two different approaches of Theory of Change and Outcomes Mapping. These two elements of MERL are really in conversation with one another – on the one hand, Theory of Change provides a working theory to help rationalise a project but it does not describe the whole system, and it may be incorrect. As a counterbalance therefore, it's important to include something which is more sensitive and responsive to what emerges in practice. This is where Outcomes Mapping can be useful. By simply asking what has changed, an organisation can both test its theory and gain insights into developments and changes that extend beyond what it was able to predict. These then become useful for refining theTheory of Change. In our process of review, we found, for example, that some of our Alumni are already forging new ways of leading that are different to the current models of leadership in the sector. Previously, we hadn't been so explicit in capturing this as an outcome, and seeking it out in our M&E processes. Now we are finding ways to do this. How is your organisation working with MERL and the related tools of Theory of Change and Outcomes Mapping?

  • No alternative text description for this image

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics