Dr. Eric Rudenshiold’s Post

View profile for Dr. Eric Rudenshiold, graphic

Senior Fellow, Caspian Policy Center // Former Director, National Security Council - Strategic Issues in Europe & Eurasia - International Policy & Development Specialist

Political expectations versus financial realities: rail guage differences, many costly tunnels and bridges, disagreements on routing… Major challenges face this and other rail projects in the region, despite connectivity benefits.

Kyrgyz officials optimistic about China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan railway project

Kyrgyz officials optimistic about China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan railway project

voanews.com

Apparently China, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan are planning to build a new railway without Russian participation. Regardless of which option for constructing the railway is ultimately chosen, the northern option or the southern option, this railway must connect China with Europe. While for Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan a new railway is an opportunity to attract investment and revenue from cargo transit, China is seeking to diversify trade routes for strategic reasons. So, in the event of a theoretical conflict around Taiwan, some sea routes may be blocked. Connecting a new railway from China to the railway network of Turkmenistan makes it possible to create a shipping line between the Turkmen port Turkmenbashi and the Azerbaijan port Baku. In addition, the new railway route provides an alternative to the railway through Russia, the transportation of goods through which is complicated due to Moscow's contradictions with Europe.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics