100 Aircraft Assembly positions open in North Charleston, SC!! Apply today at https://lnkd.in/eq2csZcE
Dunhill Staffing Systems’ Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Important read!
Sean Broderick was in South Carolina yesterday for Boeing briefings on 787 production issues, two days ahead of a hearing on Capitol Hill. Here's what he and Guy Norris found.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
You only get what you pay for
Boeing CEO Mr. Dave Calhoun questioned by Sen. Josh Hawley during the Senate Subcommittee on Investigations. Senator placed tough questions for Boeing's safety record, quality issues, cutting corners and CEO's own pay package. Sharing as received, no personal inferences to be drawn. Reuters news link: https://lnkd.in/e42HsGVj. #Boeing #Safety #AirSafety #Aircraft #B737 #B73Max
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Did you know..? During the ultimate load test for aircraft wings, like the B787, engineers subject the wings to extreme forces to ensure they can withstand the most severe conditions in flight. This test involves bending the wings to their limits to assess the strength of the main spar, which is crucial for maintaining structural integrity and ensuring the safety and reliability of the aircraft. A main spar failure during this test could result in certification issues, increased fatigue and load monitoring, and higher maintenance costs throughout the aircraft's lifespan. This verification process is essential for demonstrating the wings' capability to endure extreme forces and certify their operational safety.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Medical Technology and Education Marketing Consultant & Freelance Journalist (Healthcare - Models & Policy, Biotech, Medical Devices, Innovation, Career Coaching, Training Instruction, Health & Fitness, and Wellness)
BOEING PRODUCTION PROBLEMS PREDATE THE ALASKA AIRLINES BLOWOUT "Internal messages on Boeing’s Renton, Wash., factory log for production issues and interviews with company employees paint a picture of a workplace where crews were unable to keep a schedule and didn’t follow procedures, and in which production pressure mounted as delays piled up, WSJ’s Andrew Tangel and Sharon Terlep report. They detail the production problems that followed the 737 jet as it moved down the factory line, a disjointed process of repair and inspection that later led to a door panel blowing off in flight." #boeing #aerospace #aerospaceindustry #alaskaairlines #safety #airsafety #airlines #commercialaviation #airlineindustry #jets #jetsafety #faa #productiondelays #operationsmanagment #oversight #qa #quaityassurance #costofpoorquality #jetproduction #aircraftmanufacturing #737 #commercialjetmanufacturing #commercialjets #productionline #factoryline #wsj #boeingcrisis https://lnkd.in/ePDaciVi
Exclusive | The Disarray Inside Boeing’s 737 Factory Before the Door Plug Blowout
wsj.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
January 18, 2024 BPIAA Counterpoint | Shout Out to The Philadelphia Enquirer’s Opinion Let me repeat - ‘A Black guy’ didn’t cause Boeing’s mid air blowout.” I’m still waiting for the names of the Boeing Black executives, managers, supervisors, mechanics, engineers, or anyone Black directly or indirectly causal to this unsafe aviation occurrence! Maybe the missing bolts and I mean missing were DEI bolts…maybe the door plug was DEI…I’m just saying!🤷🏾♂️ The larger question to be addressed by NTSB and FAA (they won’t respond) is how does private and federal (fake) DEI initiatives adversely impact and denigrate aviation safety and quality control processes, protocols, and responsibilities? So while the NTSB and the FAA try to figure out the many points of failure that happened on this Alaska flight, they should also investigate the role that Boeing’s and FAA’s (sham) DEI focus plays in the apparent failures in the administration, execution, and oversight of aviation safety standards and measures that guarantee, without out all of this handwringing, tears, and we-don’t-knows, public safety in aviation and aerospace? But they won’t!🤷🏾♂️
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
A highly experienced Business Professional with a proven track record of success in Malaysia and abroad. Looking for opportunities in the Aerospace, Defense and Healthcare industry.
This is a “major” decision.
Boeing has announced the immediate dismissal of the head of its 737 MAX program, Ed Clark. This decision reflects the company’s ongoing efforts to manage the aftermath of the aircraft’s groundings and ensure the highest safety and quality standards. On top of that, an interview with the former Boeing 737 MAX Program Senior Manager Ed Pierson has surfaced, where he says he would not fly on a Boeing 737 Max because he knows that plane has got quality problems.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Want to see what goes into building a world-class engine? This video explores the engineering behind the Rolls-Royce Trent 7000. #Trent7000 #RollsRoyce
I’ve been fortunate to have been the Chief Engineer for the Rolls-Royce Trent 7000 since the Entry into Service of the A330neo in 2018. Leading a talented team, with the best engineers in the world, to bring the latest generation engine to life that delivers the very best in reliability and efficiency for our customers. This video provides some insights into what is involved and the pride and passion that is abundant in Rolls-Royce in everything that we do.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
CERTIFICATION OF AIRSHIPS Here's the best page I could find on airship certifications with the FAA. https://lnkd.in/eSCBAFQa Airships up to 9 seats, not including pilot(s) are under Airship Design Criteria, in effect since the 1980's. These could include our first ships because the semi-rigid shape depends (partially) on an inflated envelope. Rigids do not qualify. Up to 19 seats, not including pilot(s) would be under the Cummuter category, which still does not include rigid airships, but does include the Zeppelin NT. Note that the Transport Airship Requirements are for: (page 117) The transport category is defined for multi-engined propeller driven airships that have a capacity of 20 or more passengers (excluding crew), or a maximum take-off mass of 15,000 kg or more, or a design lifting gas volume of 20,000 m³ or more, whichever is greater. https://lnkd.in/ecJatQmM These are "planned" not yet in effect apparently. These would apply to most 100 meter or longer normal airships, as our 120 meter UPship for 80 passengers, of about 26,000 cubic meters. FOR SMALL AIRSHIPS (probably only up to 2 seats) there are standards developed by the American Society for the Testing of Materials (ASTM) that can be used, with a Light Sport Aircraft category Sport Pilot license. I am on the ASTM's LTA Subcommitee working on revised rules for LTA (mostly safety issues) as part of the FAA's new MOSAIC rules, in process. Airships could also be made as an Experiemental category aircraft, but likely an airship license would be required. A very lightweight (in theory up to 254 pounds, but the FAA basically never weighs them) single-seater could operate in the USA under Part 103 Ultralight rules, without a pilot's license.
Airships | Federal Aviation Administration
faa.gov
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
This highlight significant concerns about corporate responsibility, regulatory oversight, and the balance between profit and safety in the aerospace industry. The irony of multinational companies being driven to generate profit by any means, often compromising safety, quality, and worker welfare, as well as ignoring labor laws. Ultimately, for these aerospace executives, money is what matters most. The FAA should have taken a firmer stance on Boeing after whistleblowers raised concerns over quality and safety. Instead of relying on a reactive monitoring process, an active monitoring system should have been implemented to protect human lives and maintain the reputation of commercial airlines. The fault lies jointly from top to bottom, not only with Boeing but also with the FAA, which should have gone for tightening inspections and ensuring the safety of commercial aircraft.
Whistblowing function and its impact on avaition safety and commercial aircraft manufacturing industry. The Boeing case is a good example of a reputianoal risk that could have been avoided, if whistblowing inside Boeing company was taken seriously. Boeing CEO David Calhoun hearing session with Missouri Senator Josh Hawley. The hearing session was conducted based on recent whistleblower reports that several of the company's airliners were subject to production safety issues. The Missouri Senator suggested that the aerospace executive should resign from his post in disgrace amid swirling complaints about the company’s safety record.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Armed Conflicts Researcher | Geopolitical Analyst | Specialism: Europe & the Middle East - “Opinions Are My Own“
SAFETY ISSUES CONTINUE TO AFFECT BOEING Whistleblower allegations have surfaced against Boeing, raising further safety concerns. Federal authorities are probing claims by engineer Sam Salehpour regarding assembly flaws in the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, particularly related to the fastening of fuselage components. Salehpour has highlighted production shortcuts that he believes may compromise the aircraft's longevity, potentially leading to mid-flight fuselage failures. Key perspective: The whistleblower allegations against Boeing are concerning, especially given the company's history of safety issues with the 787 Dreamliner and other aircraft. This raises significant red flags about the integrity and safety of Boeing's aircraft. If substantiated, these claims could have far-reaching implications for Boeing's reputation and give further advantage to its oligopolistic rival Airbus.
To view or add a comment, sign in
14,313 followers