President Biden Praises Domestic Violence Firearms Ban
On June 21, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a federal law preventing individuals subject to domestic-violence restraining orders from possessing firearms. This decision marks the FIRST major Second Amendment ruling since the Court's landmark decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), which expanded gun rights. The law was among many imperiled by the Bruen decision requiring historical precedent for gun restrictions.
U.S. President Joe Biden, a staunch advocate against domestic violence and author of the Violence Against Women Act during his tenure as Senator, welcomed the Court's decision. Stressing its significance, Biden remarked, "No one who has been abused should have to worry about their abuser getting a gun." He further emphasized the impact, stating, "As a result of today's ruling, survivors of domestic violence and their families will still be able to count on critical protections, just as they have for the past three decades." Biden reaffirmed his commitment to ending violence against women and combating gun violence, urging the U.S. Congress to strengthen protections further and to "take action to stop the epidemic of gun violence tearing our communities apart."
In an 8-to-1 ruling in United States v. Rahimi, No. 22-915, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. stated that "when a restraining order contains a finding that an individual poses a credible threat to the physical safety of an intimate partner, that individual may — consistent with the Second Amendment — be banned from possessing firearms while that order is in effect."
Roberts clarified that "some courts have misunderstood the methodology of our recent Second Amendment cases. These precedents were not meant to suggest a law trapped in amber."
While the justices broadly supported restrictions on firearms for domestic abusers, five wrote separately from Chief Justice Roberts, indicating varied perspectives on how lower courts should evaluate and consider historical practices when reviewing Second Amendment challenges.
Justice Clarence Thomas, who authored the Bruen decision, was the lone dissenter in Rahimi, asserting that "not a single historical regulation justifies the statute at issue."
#DomesticViolence #Firearms #IntimatePartnerViolence