Education and Employment Research Center, Rutgers University’s Post

EERC’s review of research on noncredit credential quality shows a considerable body of creative, insightful research on student outcomes. But the review also shows how weak and varied the underlying data sources in this field of study are. There is little national data available on noncredit education, leaving a handful of states to collect and analyze their own emerging evidence bases, typically in partnership with outside researchers. We recommend that researchers in the field focus on areas in need of more exploration, such as longitudinal analysis, linkage of state data sets to wage and K-16 data, and consideration of equity implications. In addition, researchers need to learn much more about student goals and strategies, particularly in relation to instructional purpose and links to employers. Labor market outcomes need to be studied at a more granular level, across industries in a single area, across programs focused on particular employer needs, and more. Finally, the U.S. Departments of Education and Labor should take a more proactive role in supporting the inclusion of noncredit education in new and existing data products. Read more from the report: https://lnkd.in/ewn_BKhN ECMC Foundation

Review of the Evidence on Noncredit Education

smlr.rutgers.edu

And funding…

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics