Ehs A.’s Post

Remote hiring can save money, but focusing solely on the cheapest option? That’s a trap ⚠️ Here’s the reality: yes, remote hiring—especially for virtual assistants—often comes at a fraction of the cost compared to in-office staff. That’s a huge advantage. But… focusing on cost over skills can be a disaster in disguise 💣. I've been there—lured by the temptation of cutting costs, only to realize that the VA I hired didn’t align with the specific needs of the role. What did I end up with? Delayed projects, confusion, and in some cases, having to redo work entirely. The savings? Lost. The time wasted? Immense ⏳. 🔑 Here’s a key lesson: "cheap" doesn't equal "good fit." The right VA isn’t the one who costs the least; it's the one who matches the skills your business actually requires. That mismatch? It costs far more in the long run than any upfront savings. 👉 If you’re hiring a VA for lead generation, don’t just go for the lowest bidder. Make sure they have a solid background in cold calling, CRM management, or whatever specific tools you use. Hiring for social media? Look for someone with real experience in content creation and engagement, not just a low hourly rate. You get what you pay for—invest wisely. Remember: The goal is not to just “fill a position” but to find someone who can genuinely help your business grow and succeed 🌱. Let’s talk: What have been your experiences with remote hiring? Do you prioritize cost, skills, or a balance of both? #RemoteHiring #VirtualAssistants #BusinessGrowth #VirtualTeams #Entrepreneurship #HiringTips #SkillsOverCost #VAIndustry

  • No alternative text description for this image
Idongesit Ubong

Project & Operations Manager | Community Manager | Customer Support | Executive Assistant | I help startups and brands build strategic systems, boost productivity by 30%+, and reduce failure risk by 70%.

5mo

📌 Do you offer opportunities for internships in your organisation?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics