Environmental Health Project’s Post

The #GSHPA is pleased to announce the new leads of our Standards working group as Ken Gordon and Chris Davidson. They take this on from our esteemed member Robin Curtis. Our Standards include the vertical borehole standard, thermal transfer fluid and the open loop standard, which are used throughout the industry and are embedded in legislation as Statutory Instruments. We have now launched a new embodied carbon working group, chaired by Ken Gordon, Casper Sanany and Rob Gardiner. We look forward to member involvement in this new group and the results. #GSHPA #LeadershipAnnouncement #IndustryStandards #Geothermal #KenGordon #ChrisDavidson #RobinCurtis #VerticalBorehole #ThermalTransferFluid #OpenLoopStandard #EmbodiedCarbon #Sustainability #EnvironmentalImpact #Legislation #StatutoryInstruments #Innovation #MemberInvolvement #EnergyEfficiency #ClimateAction #SustainableFuture

On-Demand Insight: Cost Savings with the DR416iE If you missed our live webinar, you can still access the valuable insights shared about the DR416iE electric rotary drill. Learn how it delivers not only environmental benefits but also significant cost savings. Watch the on-demand webinar now! https://go.sandvik/1Ci #MiningCostSavings #DR416iEWebinar #SustainableBusiness

Ground source heat pumps are overlooked and poorly understood by a supplier base looking to swap over from gas boilers. There is a huge wealth of knowledge amongst the GSHPA and our standards are important in shaping the future of low carbon heating and cooling.

How do we overcome personal bias in the carbon storage analysis process? Screening and ranking carbon storage sites might seem like a solely technical process, but it requires several non-technical factors to be considered, as well. While non-technical criteria can impact project costs and timings just as much as their technical counterparts, they pose one major, unique hurdle: subjectivity. Which is why we must look at what the science tells us. Gino Thielens (SLB’s Director of Carbon Storage) and Arnaud Van der Beken (Head of CCUS Solutions) explain:

How do we overcome personal bias in the carbon storage analysis process? Screening and ranking carbon storage sites might seem like a solely technical process, but it requires several non-technical factors to be considered, as well. While non-technical criteria can impact project costs and timings just as much as their technical counterparts, they pose one major, unique hurdle: subjectivity. Which is why we must look at what the science tells us. Gino Thielens (SLB’s Director of Carbon Storage) and Arnaud Van der Beken (Head of CCUS Solutions) explain:

How do we overcome personal bias in the carbon storage analysis process? Screening and ranking carbon storage sites might seem like a solely technical process, but it requires several non-technical factors to be considered, as well. While non-technical criteria can impact project costs and timings just as much as their technical counterparts, they pose one major, unique hurdle: subjectivity. Which is why we must look at what the science tells us. Gino Thielens (SLB’s Director of Carbon Storage) and Arnaud Van der Beken (Head of CCUS Solutions) explain:

How do we overcome personal bias in the carbon storage analysis process? Screening and ranking carbon storage sites might seem like a solely technical process, but it requires several non-technical factors to be considered, as well. While non-technical criteria can impact project costs and timings just as much as their technical counterparts, they pose one major, unique hurdle: subjectivity. Which is why we must look at what the science tells us. Gino Thielens (SLB’s Director of Carbon Storage) and Arnaud Van der Beken (Head of CCUS Solutions) explain:

How do we overcome personal bias in the carbon storage analysis process? Screening and ranking carbon storage sites might seem like a solely technical process, but it requires several non-technical factors to be considered, as well. While non-technical criteria can impact project costs and timings just as much as their technical counterparts, they pose one major, unique hurdle: subjectivity. Which is why we must look at what the science tells us. Gino Thielens (SLB’s Director of Carbon Storage) and Arnaud Van der Beken (Head of CCUS Solutions) explain:

How do we overcome personal bias in the carbon storage analysis process? Screening and ranking carbon storage sites might seem like a solely technical process, but it requires several non-technical factors to be considered, as well. While non-technical criteria can impact project costs and timings just as much as their technical counterparts, they pose one major, unique hurdle: subjectivity. Which is why we must look at what the science tells us. Gino Thielens (SLB’s Director of Carbon Storage) and Arnaud Van der Beken (Head of CCUS Solutions) explain:

How do we overcome personal bias in the carbon storage analysis process? Screening and ranking carbon storage sites might seem like a solely technical process, but it requires several non-technical factors to be considered, as well. While non-technical criteria can impact project costs and timings just as much as their technical counterparts, they pose one major, unique hurdle: subjectivity. Which is why we must look at what the science tells us. Gino Thielens (SLB’s Director of Carbon Storage) and Arnaud Van der Beken (Head of CCUS Solutions) explain: