ExchangeMonitor’s Post

View organization page for ExchangeMonitor, graphic

105 followers

A Letter From the Editor You’ll sometimes hear politicians say, often just before or immediately after a decisive policy defeat, that such-and-such a thing is not a partisan issue, not a right, a left or a center issue, but an everyone issue. They’re right, of course. Issues like that unite everyone, usually in bitter, intractable opposition. Welcome to the world of spent nuclear fuel disposal, opposed with equal verve by ragers against the administrative state, environmental justice warriors and ordinary people concerned about a lot of green goo. In this week’s featured story, which I wrote after it got pushed out into the world by local interests uninterested in local storage of nuclear waste, you’ll read how the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals effectively shut down a plausible means of consolidating and storing, somewhere other than next door to the reactors that generated it, spent nuclear fuel from commercially operated power plants. The court had already blocked a long-term interim storage site planned in Andrews County, Texas by a joint venture of Waste Control Specialists and Orano, and the case opened a legal backdoor that allowed the court, if so moved, to pull the plug on a similar facility proposed by Holtec International in eastern New Mexico. Recently, someone walked through that door. Thanks for reading all about it. Dan Leone Editor, ExchangeMonitor Publications

After Texas case, Fifth Circuit also throws out Holtec license for New Mexico interim storage - ExchangeMonitor

After Texas case, Fifth Circuit also throws out Holtec license for New Mexico interim storage - ExchangeMonitor

exchangemonitor.com

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics