FastWave Medical’s Post

Get ready for another fellows-themed interview, this time with Dr. Geoffrey Barnes, Associate Professor of Internal Medicine at the University of Michigan specializing in cardiovascular and vascular medicine. In this interview, Dr. Barnes candidly talks about his first year out of fellowship, how he eventually built a network of mentors, and insights he’s gleaned about the economics of healthcare. When Dr. Barnes said that his favorite activity was watching Disney movies with his daughter, we tracked down Adassa, the voice of Delores in Encanto, to send him a shoutout. Not only did she thank Dr. Barnes on our behalf for this interview, but also sang  ‘We Don’t Talk About Bruno’ for his daughter. Don’t miss out this sweet moment in the video! 👇🏼 Here’s a teaser on the full conversation: ❓FastWave Medical: You’re well-published and have participated in a lot of medical research. What advice would you give to younger physicians interested in getting more involved with clinical trials? 💡Dr. Barnes: I recommend two things. First, make connections with faculty at your training center. Find out who’s leading projects that you can get involved in. Team up with someone who's doing something you're interested in or get them to support an idea you have. Second, build your network both inside and outside your institution. Connect on social media, go to national society meetings, and get involved in committees. Those connections with other leaders, both peers and mentors, are critical for opening up opportunities to be part of a paper, get involved in a trial, or anything else. Make a real effort to build your network. Check out the full interview with Dr. Barnes here: https://lnkd.in/gPNFrZJ3 

The Medical Research Council has launched two new schemes which will demystify their peer review processes, nurture diverse talent and support the development and retention of researchers.      MRC Board and Panel Observer Scheme  This scheme supersedes the MRC's previous board observer scheme and provides researchers transitioning to independence with the opportunity to observe an MRC board or panel. They have expanded the opportunity into more of the MRC boards and panels, broadened the eligibility beyond MRC award holders, and will proritise places for underrepresented groups.    The MRC hope the opportunity will allow observers to better understand how complex elements, i.e. research questions, methodological approach, expected value or impact and cost effectiveness, come together to determine which applications are awarded.    For more information on this scheme and how to apply please visit: https://lnkd.in/edvfJxN5   MRC Board and Panel Associates Scheme  The new MRC board and panel associates scheme will offer valuable experience that is an integral part of building a successful research career. It will provide researchers the opportunity to gain experience of peer review, serve on an MRC funding board or panel and benefit from mentorship as part of a two-year programme. It is aimed at researchers from underrepresented groups who are actively transitioning to independence and leadership.   For more information on this scheme and how to apply please visit: https://lnkd.in/ew9_mWRq

If you did not register for the AAPath 2024 Annual Meeting, register today (https://lnkd.in/eB8db5ug) for on-demand access to the high quality, relevant, and timely content on cross-cutting topics, such as: - The critical role of academic pathologists on the health care team to improve patient care - Innovating the research infrastructure - Perspectives on resident unionization efforts from GME leaders - Fostering an inclusive workforce by understanding neurodiversity - Integrating pathology into the pre-clinical curriculum and the clinical clerkship years - Considerations for investing in digital pathology - Strategies for using ERAS and signaling tokens for recruitment - Progress towards competency-based medical education and assessments in residency programs - The fundamentals of advocacy, locally and nationally - Artificial intelligence in pathology education

"An encouraging finding is that evaluation bias was reduced with systematic pedagogic changes in rating systems reflected in the transition from the RAES system to the Milestone system. One explanation for this, which is supported by education research, is that milestones are more systematic and descriptive than the previous rating system because they provide more information about what each rating level refers to via use of competency-based milestones anchored to detailed descriptors of clinical knowledge rather than numbers, which may not be interpreted consistently." I've cited a number of articles that cite the importance of diversifying the clinical workforce and addressing misperceptions around the quality of physicians of color. Part of addressing #structuralracism is understanding that components of the system have bias embedded in them. Yes, this article and its authors cite altering the system of rating. That's not adjusting the score because we don't like the outcome but understanding that the outcome may have been predetermined. It's this type of examination and re-examination that allows us to develop a clinical workforce reflective of the population. #DEI #diversityequityinclusion #blackhistorymonth #BHM https://buff.ly/3wjgdcy

Quite a worrying trend that can impact #research quality & eventually harm clinical decision making. "Yet an analysis of PubMed-indexed publications found that most medical student articles were reviews or case reports, and the majority (59%) were cited not even once. Rather than scientific curiosity, the burgeoning research output by medical students is partially a consequence of the residency selection process." https://lnkd.in/eY5RFFAC No wonder there's a rise in paper mills and groups exploiting #IMGs. We covered this recently - https://lnkd.in/eDBNV9gs

➡ 🔓 Epistemic Injustice in the Medical Context: Introduction to Special Issue by Rena Goldstein https://lnkd.in/evsfW3xw [open access] ABSTRACT – SPECIAL ISSUE INTRODUCTION This special issue aims to delve deeper into the manifestations of epistemic injustice within asymmetric relationships, such as those between laypersons and experts (e.g. patients and physicians). We focus on distinguishing between warranted and unwarranted epistemic exclusions, recognizing that some epistemic harms may stem from justified exclusions, thus necessitating consideration of both just and unjust exclusions. Using examples from the medical field, including instances of misdiagnosis based on statistical correlations, we highlight the intricate nature of epistemic exclusions and their ethical implications. While some exclusions may align with established epistemic practices, others arise from unnecessary practices fueled by identity prejudice or power dynamics, thus presenting as instances of epistemic injustice. Additionally, our exploration of epistemic gaps, particularly within complex environments like medicine, illuminates the challenges individuals face in effectively conveying their experiences and accessing pertinent information. While certain forms of epistemic isolation may be warranted, others result from structural barriers hindering knowledge exchange, prompting critical reflection on the ethical dimensions of such practices. KEYWORDS: epistemic injustice medicine epistemic exclusions epistemic gaps epistemic isolation Many thanks to all the contributors who presented and commented at the conference ‘Epistemic Injustice in the Medical Context’, held at the University of California on November 17th and 18th, 2022. This conference was supported by both the UCI Center for Medical Humanities and UCI Humanities Center. Information about the conference can be found https://lnkd.in/ehi7Pq6b. #socialepistemology #journal #article #research #academia #knowledge #medicine #isolation #injustice #equality

Caner Turan, recognized as the Science Methodology Supervisor of the Month, plays a pivotal role in the Cardiology-Intensive Group, where he fosters learning, manages projects, and inspires excellence. He views medical practice and research as intertwined, believing that neither can thrive without the other. Despite his passion for his role, his biggest challenge is restraining himself from taking on more students. #TranslationalMedicine #IntensiveCare #ResearchExcellence 🏥🔬 https://lnkd.in/dRaRfvSW

Success in medical research is often attributed to a combination of factors, and it can vary based on the specific context and goals of the research. Here are the three key elements

https://lnkd.in/g2UKVByJ In this cohort study of 116 904 medical undergraduate students, a new tool demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, construct validity, and criterion validity as a measure of equity and inclusion

Scholastic Medical Sciences journal https://lnkd.in/gC4rWwgr Highlights 🔸 1. International research journal that Publishes articles on Multidisciplinary fields. 2. Prompt Acknowledgement after receiving the article. 3. Thorough Double blinded peer review. 4. Rapid Publication after the article is peer reviewed through eminent reviewers. 5. Acceptance and Publication of papers with excellence, novelty and originality. 6. Affordable publication fee. 7. Issue of Publication Certificate to author. 8. High visibility of your Published work. 9. Best Global knowledge sharing platform. Slots open for upcoming issue: before 25th of January, 2024 Reach any queries to+91 9440535204 #articles #smallworks #medicine #scholasticopenaccess #researchers #professors #surgeons