#Job | #JobPost | #JobPosting | #JobApplication | #ResearchPosition 📣 𝕎𝔼'𝔸ℝ𝔼 ℍ𝕀ℝ𝕀ℕ𝔾❗ #FondazioneEniEnricoMattei (#FEEM) is seeking 𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬 with solid experience in one of the following fields: ✅ [𝑇𝑦𝑝𝑒 𝐴 𝐶𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑒] 𝐋𝐚𝐰 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐧𝐯𝐢𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐤𝐬 𝑂𝑅 ✅ [𝑇𝑦𝑝𝑒 𝐵 𝐶𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑒] 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐬𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐤 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 The selected candidate will join the FEEM Team working in #Basilicata and on a national and European scale, a research group dedicated to analyzing the connections between the critical #localimpacts of #climatechange and socio-economic impacts, and the goals of European #climatetransition, #green, and blue-#waterpolicies. 𝖶𝗂𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝖺𝗆, 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗐𝗂𝗅𝗅 𝖿𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗌 𝗈𝗇 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗅𝗅𝗈𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗐𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗃𝖾𝖼𝗍 𝗈𝖻𝗃𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗌: 🟢 𝑇𝑦𝑝𝑒 𝐴 𝐶𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑒: Investigation and research on ethical and jurisdictional issues related to #naturaldisasters and #climateimpacts 🟢 𝑇𝑦𝑝𝑒 𝐵 𝐶𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑒: #Datascience, quantitative #modeling, and indices to understand, simulate, and project #naturalrisk scenarios and #climate challenges with related solutions. 🏦 𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒈𝒆𝒕𝒕𝒐 𝑪𝑳𝑰𝑴𝑨𝑻𝑬 𝑹𝑰𝑺𝑲 𝑷𝑶𝑳𝑰𝑪𝒀 𝑵𝑬𝑿𝑼𝑺 📄 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑙’Università degli Studi di Firenze 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑙𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑧𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑑𝑖 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑎̀ 𝑑𝑖 𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎 𝑠𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑂𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑖 𝑑𝑖 𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎 𝑒 𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒, 𝑛𝑒𝑙𝑙’𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑜 “𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖-𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑘 𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒 (𝑅𝐸𝑇𝑈𝑅𝑁 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑧𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑙𝑙’𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑃𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑁𝑎𝑧𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑒 𝑑𝑖 𝑅𝑖𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑒 𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑧𝑎, 𝑀𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑒 4 “𝐼𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎” – 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 2 “𝐷𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑎 𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑙’𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎” – 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 1.3, 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑧𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑙𝑙’𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑎 – 𝑁𝑒𝑥𝑡 𝐺𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐸𝑈. European Union #NextGenerationEU ℹ️🔗 𝑀𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ℎ𝑜𝑤 𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑒 👇🏻 https://lnkd.in/dYKJjSPc
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
☘️🪲Coming soon🍂💦 🌳Blue Leaf Research Institute: Where Research Meets Innovation 🌵📚 I am thrilled to officially announce the upcoming launch of Blue Leaf Research Institute—a specialized hub for Environmental 🌱 and Geospatial 🌐 Research 📊 and Training 🎓. This vision has been growing for some time, rooted in the belief that data-driven insights 📈, cutting-edge research 🧠, and specialized training 🛠️ are the keys to addressing modern environmental challenges. Now, the time has come to bring it to life! As the brother organization to Namaqua Environmental 🤝, Blue Leaf Research Institute complements its legacy by focusing on research, training, and capacity building, ensuring that environmental and geospatial professionals are well-equipped to meet today’s and tomorrow's challenges. What Blue Leaf Research Institute Will Focus On: ✅ 🌍 Environmental Research: Solving critical environmental challenges through advanced research methodologies and innovative solutions. ✅ 🗺️ Geospatial Research: Leveraging GIS, Remote Sensing 🛰️, and spatial analytics to drive smarter decision-making. ✅ 📊 Data Analytics: Equipping professionals with tools to analyze and interpret environmental data effectively. ✅ 🎓 Specialized Training Programs: Offering industry-aligned courses 📜 designed around real-world experience 💼 and market demands 📡. ✅ 🤝 Collaborative Partnerships: Working closely with Environmental 🌿 and Geospatial Organizations to ensure high-quality, accredited courses 🏅. ✅ 💡 Career Development & Mentorship: Assisting recent graduates 🎓 in navigating the saturated job market 🛡️ through mentorship 🧭 and career guidance 🗝️. ❔ Why Blue Leaf Research Institute 🔹 Industry-Relevant Skills 🛠️: Programs tailored to meet current industry standards. 🔹 Hands-On Training 🧪: Practical, experience-based learning for real-world applications. 🔹 Networking Opportunities 🌐: Connect with professionals and experts in Environmental and Geospatial fields. 🔹 Graduate Empowerment 🚀: Dedicated support to help graduates enter the workforce with confidence. At Blue Leaf Research Institute, in partnership with Namaqua Environmental 🌿, we are not just building a training center—we are cultivating a community of innovators 🤖, researchers 🧠, and passionate professionals committed to creating sustainable change. 💡 Remain tuned for our grand launch! 📅 Together, let’s shape a smarter, greener future. 🌍🌱 #EnvironmentalResearch 🌍 #GeospatialScience 🗺️ #TrainingInstitute 🎓 #DataAnalytics 📊 #CareerDevelopment 💼 #Sustainability 🌱 #Innovation 🚀 #BlueLeafResearchInstitute 💚 #NamaquaEnvironmental 🤝
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
#CallforPapers: Drive global #sustainability transformations with #GAIA journal Join us in addressing the world’s most pressing environmental challenges through cutting-edge, inter- and transdisciplinary research. Whether you're an early-career researcher or a seasoned expert, we invite submissions of novel methodologies and solutions advancing sustainability transformations. >>Why publish with GAIA? - High visibility: Indexed in Web of Science, Scopus, and other leading databases. - Fast turnaround: Avg. submission to acceptance in 128 days. - Rigorous standards: Double-blind peer review ensuring high academic standards. - Open access options: Choose Green or Gold OA for wider reach. - Exceptional visuals: Showcase your work with impactful charts and maps in full color. >>We’re looking for: Research articles | Review articles | Design reports | Forum essays >>Topics of interest include: Biodiversity | Climate change | Ecosystem services | Environmental governance | Socio-ecological systems | Sustainability science & policy | Sustainability transformations | and more! >>About GAIA GAIA is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to fostering society’s capacity for sustainability-oriented action. Our journal bridges science and practice, publishing empirical and theoretical insights that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries. >>Submissions accepted year-round. GAIA is published quarterly, and submissions are accepted on a rolling basis. Let’s shape a sustainable future together—submit your groundbreaking research today! >>Ready to submit? Visit https://lnkd.in/dHuQvjkN #ClimateChange #SustainableDevelopment #EnvironmentalGovernance #SustainabilityScience #TransdisciplinaryResearch #TransformativeResearch #Research #AcademicPublishing #OpenAccess
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
I’m happy to share that I’m starting a new position as Research Assistant at Save the Children in Bangladesh on a qualitative research project named "Sustainable Water Solutions for Climate Vulnerable Communities in Satkhira" with the collaboration of Monash University Australia. In this project, I have helped in developing tools before the survey. I have conducted FGDs and child participatory tools to get the relevant findings regarding our research objective. However, I have learnt one thing, research is a journey. It is not confined within the 6 steps or 2-3 approaches. It is a personal journey which helps us to grow, to observe and most importantly, to make an impact.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Why Doesn't Important Research Get Attention? I am currently revising a lecture for students on impactful research and find myself asking the above question (again). Important findings are too often overlooked amidst the constant flood of competing information. Our work (all are team efforts) has yielded some examples I think are important - like our observations of a 20% decline in Borneo rainfall since industrial deforestation began in the 1970s [https://lnkd.in/eiVEXHYE] or our analysis showing that the atmospheric processes that carry much of the rain to Asia is under imminent threat [https://lnkd.in/ewqrkeaz]. The implications appear profound, but they fail to spark much notice from peers let alone policy makers. Positive stories too can struggle to gain traction. For example, our research showing we can achieve several hundred percent increases in African soil/groundwater recharge in some drylands when we have suitable tree cover rather than not [https://lnkd.in/eBWjFkuf]. These studies appear to have important implications (I am sure other researchers would choose their own selection of neglected studies and conclusions). Why do such findings struggle to gain notice? With so many claims to assess we may often be unwilling or unable to engage with ideas that challenge existing narratives or new ideas that require nuanced evaluation. As researchers, we know science is an ongoing process. Embracing uncertainty and giving proper credence to emerging research is necessary to foster more substantive dialogues about complex challenges—but we do need to filter the signal from the noise. How can we better identify important and (potentially) impactful research? Any thoughts? There is a lot of guidance out there on engaging with the media and developing a theory of change to target specific end users ... but what to advise when we (modest and self-doubting researchers) are addressing more general societal challenges? Thoughts welcome ... #WUR #CIFOR #impact #SDGs #biodiversity #conservation #research #tropicalforests #environment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Excellent question! As a freelance science journalist from Indonesia, I have some points to add to the discussion: 1. The gatekeepers of the media world are the editors. How do they decide which research to cover and which one is not? It really depends on the editorial position or the idealism of the media publication. So, if scientists/freelance journalists want to reach out to staff journalists/editors, they need to look into what kind of stories the publications do. 2. Besides idealism, editors and journalists also consider research magnitude—how globally significant it is (especially if it's an international publication). This could be very subjective. I pitched a story to a publication, and the editor said the research was "not important." But a few months later, the research happened to be part of "a more global research group," and it made headlines in Western media. Too often, I have to work harder to convince editors about the significance of research coming from Indonesia or Southeast Asia. 3. Geography might also play a role. For example, I recently got a tip-off from a scientist about the deforestation happening in Aceh. As I guessed, the editor rejected the pitch because it was too local for the publication. The scientist was disappointed because he thought the area had global importance no matter how localized it was. In this situation, my position is neutral. I let the scientist directly contact the editor to deliver his objection. Having said that, I propose that: 1. We need a new publication that facilitates good science journalism in a national or regional context. This way, critical research on Indonesia and Southeast Asia is not overlooked. But we have a problem with the funding. I am open to those who want to work with me and the Society of Indonesian Science Journalists to create this kind of website. Dewi Safitri and I have already managed a pilot project called The Malay Archipelago---a website that publishes stories on the dynamic of Indonesia's natural world--but we are stuck with resources--funding, and writers. 2. Scientists could continue spreading the words without the need of journalists. This could be tricky, but surely, there is nothing to lose. Unless you are boasting too much about your research, communicating your findings is the best thing we need (we= society, the public). You could write social media posts/blog posts. In Indonesia, this worked really well at the time of COVID. This way, the public knows of your existence, and journalists could easily think of your name when they cover stories related to your work. 3. Scientists have to realize that the work of journalists is not to promote their research. They have to understand that what journalism does is to contextualize your research in socio-political narrative. So, scientists have to get ready for criticism. One research could look very important to scientists but not to journalists who see the world differently.
Why Doesn't Important Research Get Attention? I am currently revising a lecture for students on impactful research and find myself asking the above question (again). Important findings are too often overlooked amidst the constant flood of competing information. Our work (all are team efforts) has yielded some examples I think are important - like our observations of a 20% decline in Borneo rainfall since industrial deforestation began in the 1970s [https://lnkd.in/eiVEXHYE] or our analysis showing that the atmospheric processes that carry much of the rain to Asia is under imminent threat [https://lnkd.in/ewqrkeaz]. The implications appear profound, but they fail to spark much notice from peers let alone policy makers. Positive stories too can struggle to gain traction. For example, our research showing we can achieve several hundred percent increases in African soil/groundwater recharge in some drylands when we have suitable tree cover rather than not [https://lnkd.in/eBWjFkuf]. These studies appear to have important implications (I am sure other researchers would choose their own selection of neglected studies and conclusions). Why do such findings struggle to gain notice? With so many claims to assess we may often be unwilling or unable to engage with ideas that challenge existing narratives or new ideas that require nuanced evaluation. As researchers, we know science is an ongoing process. Embracing uncertainty and giving proper credence to emerging research is necessary to foster more substantive dialogues about complex challenges—but we do need to filter the signal from the noise. How can we better identify important and (potentially) impactful research? Any thoughts? There is a lot of guidance out there on engaging with the media and developing a theory of change to target specific end users ... but what to advise when we (modest and self-doubting researchers) are addressing more general societal challenges? Thoughts welcome ... #WUR #CIFOR #impact #SDGs #biodiversity #conservation #research #tropicalforests #environment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚨 Exciting Leadership Opportunities in Environmental Science 🚨 UKCEH is hiring four Associate Science Directors to provide leadership for dedicated science areas and across the organisation. Our science makes a real difference in the world. These roles cover diverse science areas, each critical to tackling today’s environmental challenges. 🔍 What We’re Looking For We’re seeking visionary leaders with a strategic mindset and a proven ability to bring out the best in multidisciplinary teams. Your leadership will ensure UKCEH continues to deliver impactful science, addressing both current and emerging environmental priorities. 💼 Your role As a member of our Executive and Science Leadership Committees, you’ll play a vital role in shaping UKCEH’s direction. You’ll lead teams of passionate scientists and work collaboratively to deliver our bold new strategy. Together, we’ll build an organisation equipped to provide the scientific insights the world needs. Ready to make an impact? Apply by 25 November! 🐛 Biodiversity and Land Use Science Area: Tackling the biodiversity crisis needs data and insights at various levels. You’ll guide efforts to improve understanding of ecosystems, restoration, and balancing agriculture with biodiversity. ➡ https://lnkd.in/e-5cpFzc ⚠ Environmental Pressures and Response Science Area: The environment faces threats from various pollutants and contaminants affecting how ecosystems function. This science area works across air, land, and water to understand these impacts and inform action to address them. ➡ https://lnkd.in/eFDEF_z5 ⛈ Hydroclimate Extremes and Resilience: Climate change is causing more extreme hydrological events. Your expertise in hydrological research or water management will guide UKCEH’s scientific direction, which includes the Floods and Droughts Research Infrastructure ➡ https://lnkd.in/e6iqgDwm 🌱 Surface Atmosphere Interactions and Effects Science Area: The land-atmosphere interface is crucial for managing greenhouse gases and pollutants. By combining soil, vegetation, and advanced monitoring expertise, this research informs air quality, Net Zero goals, and land management. Your multidisciplinary experience will guide this science area. ➡ https://lnkd.in/ed2zEyzy #ScienceJobs #UKCEHJobs #EnvironmentalScience Doug Wilson OBE Stuart Wainwright OBE Anita Petrie
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🎉 Thrilled to have completed the Ecosystem Services and Sustainable Development course from the University of Geneva! This experience has given me invaluable insights and tools for sustainable natural resource management and deeper understanding of how ecosystem services (ES) play a crucial role in policy and decision-making. Prof. Martin Schlaepfer’s thoughtful curiosity was truly contagious, driving me forward throughout the course. His iterative approach created a positive, cumulative momentum that enriched the entire learning experience. Pavan Sukhdev's perspective and the idea that an honest ES valuation can have real positive impact is a fascinating view which made a lot of sense. Prof Mike Hannis's focused criticism of the ES method is setting me up to be vigilant of slippery slopes and actively engage in critical reflection. Brigitte Baptiste ’s insights have illuminated the role of indigenous communities and cultural values in shaping Ecosystem Services, prompting me to reflect deeply on my own cultural perspectives. Prof Juliet Fall's examination of the potential pitfalls of ES method, her firm inquisition of sociological consequences, and ultimately questioning the credibility of ES felt like a healthy sentiment that is necessary for any new concept. Prof Anthony Lehmann's calm inquisitiveness and unique insights are much appreciated; this is especially visible when he enables fellow speakers during interviews. Here's a snapshot of what I learned: 🌍 Understanding the link between ecosystem services and sustainable development for managing shared resources 💰 Valuing ES economically while respecting diverse cultural perspectives on nature and biodiversity 📜 Exploring the historical and ethical dimensions of ES, and how these relate to modern policy trends 📊 Applying technical tools like remote sensing and predictive modeling to monitor and map ES across scales 🤝 Recognizing strategies to mainstream ES in governance for global impact With these skills, I’m excited to drive projects that balance development with sustainability and promote ecosystem-friendly policies. Grateful to everyone who made this course a success! #EcosystemServices #Sustainability #ProfessionalGrowth #NaturalResourceManagement #UniversityOfGeneva
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
thanks for this insightful take, Dyna. many similarities to the challenges i face with covering science in Africa. i truly wish more scientists and researchers alike understand how the media operates, and the hard work we (freelance science writers reporting in the global south) put in to ensure that scientists from our regions -- and the work they do -- are covered in journalism. i have found that it takes lots and lots of curiosity and compassion to work with reseachers from Africa to tell their stories. i also strive to be transparent and educate when i can -- the job falls on us to teach scientists, not just the public, especially because science journalism isn't robust in our regions. i have been disrespected by reseachers, for instance, over my inability to include them in stories after interviewing them despite apologizing for taking their time and explaining why i couldn't include them in the piece. of course, speaking to the press doesn't always mean publicity or a mention. And it's not our responsibility to pander to sources. but these are just some of the nuances and realities of reporting in our regions. i have had a months-long piece killed simply because the researcher insisted they must review my writing (like literarily infiltrate the piece with their own words) and get approval from their boss before publication -- something editors will never allow in a million years. but this was an extreme and rare case in my experience. as an African science writer, i'm always eager to cover impactful research from Africa. i respect the work of African scientists and i want the public to understand it, too. i want the government to make science-based decisions for the good of the public. i want people to trust what i'm saying, and they might not if turns out that as journalists we're simply promoting the work of reseachers and the foreign institutions that fund them. while i strongly push to cover the work of African scientists, i believe we must also have the courage to hold ourselves to the highest of standards, be accountable, and be responsible to the society we serve. to me, all of these is the more reason why i believe we need robust science journalism in our respective regions. the mission is bigger than covering any single research, scientist, or person. but to fearsomely cover our regions and be the chroniclers and storytellers of our history and people.
Why Doesn't Important Research Get Attention? I am currently revising a lecture for students on impactful research and find myself asking the above question (again). Important findings are too often overlooked amidst the constant flood of competing information. Our work (all are team efforts) has yielded some examples I think are important - like our observations of a 20% decline in Borneo rainfall since industrial deforestation began in the 1970s [https://lnkd.in/eiVEXHYE] or our analysis showing that the atmospheric processes that carry much of the rain to Asia is under imminent threat [https://lnkd.in/ewqrkeaz]. The implications appear profound, but they fail to spark much notice from peers let alone policy makers. Positive stories too can struggle to gain traction. For example, our research showing we can achieve several hundred percent increases in African soil/groundwater recharge in some drylands when we have suitable tree cover rather than not [https://lnkd.in/eBWjFkuf]. These studies appear to have important implications (I am sure other researchers would choose their own selection of neglected studies and conclusions). Why do such findings struggle to gain notice? With so many claims to assess we may often be unwilling or unable to engage with ideas that challenge existing narratives or new ideas that require nuanced evaluation. As researchers, we know science is an ongoing process. Embracing uncertainty and giving proper credence to emerging research is necessary to foster more substantive dialogues about complex challenges—but we do need to filter the signal from the noise. How can we better identify important and (potentially) impactful research? Any thoughts? There is a lot of guidance out there on engaging with the media and developing a theory of change to target specific end users ... but what to advise when we (modest and self-doubting researchers) are addressing more general societal challenges? Thoughts welcome ... #WUR #CIFOR #impact #SDGs #biodiversity #conservation #research #tropicalforests #environment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🗣️ #CitizenScience: The 🧡 of ENFORCE's Approach to Environmental Compliance 🌍 #ENFORCE aims to empower communities to actively participate in environmental monitoring, making their voices heard in the regulatory process. 🔍 What is Citizen Science? Citizen Science is the practice of engaging non-professional volunteers —ordinary citizens—in scientific research and data collection. In ENFORCE, we leverage citizen science to involve local communities in monitoring environmental conditions, such as air and water quality, and ensure that their observations contribute directly to meaningful policy actions. 🌱 Why Citizen Science? Traditional data collection methods can miss the local nuances of environmental issues. By involving citizens directly, we tap into a powerful source of local knowledge, ensuring data is not only comprehensive but also reflects the true state of our environments. 🚀 What We're Doing - Engaging Local Communities: We partner with grassroots organizations and local authorities to equip #citizens with the tools and training they need for effective monitoring. - #Data with Impact: Citizen-collected data will be aligned with official standards, making it a valuable resource for legal compliance and policy-making. - Real Case Studies: From #AirQuality monitoring in Brasov, Romania to tackling water pollution in Crete, Greece—citizens are at the forefront, driving actionable insights. 📈 The Outcome #ENFORCE aims to create a new standard for environmental compliance, where community engagement is key to better governance and sustainability. 👀 Join our community and share the news with your network! Newsletter: eepurl.com/iYd35M Central hub. linktr.ee/join_enforce #Enforce_eu CINEA - European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency Svetlana Klessova Chrysi Laspidou G.A.C. Group (GAC) France CSIC Bielefeld University Πανεπιστήμιο Κρήτης - University of Crete Hasselt University International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) 52°North GmbH SingularLogic IDC4EU EVISIGHTS AMARANTHUS Business Development Group Romania ENoLL (European Network of Living Labs) EARSC ECSA - European Citizen Science Association A SUD Onlus CIHEAM Bari ENRICH GLOBAL Waag Futurelab Digital for Planet University of Exeter Centre for Water Systems Westcountry Rivers Trust EMBIMOS Research Group (ICM-CSIC)
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The European Topic Centre on Data Integration and Digitalisation (ETC DI) is a Consortium comprising 10 partners based in various EU countries. We support the European Environment Agency in its digitalisation process, including the harmonisation and enhancement of data reporting and data management, and increasing relevant capacities across #EIONET, the European Environment Information and Observation Network. While our consortium’s expertise lies in data management and analytics, technology, and digitalisation, ETC DI also collaborates with #EEA and other ETCs in a multitude of other areas. Our joint efforts span 🦋 Biodiversity and ecosystems 🌳, 💧 Climate change mitigation and adaptation 🔥, 🤒 Human health and environment 🌎, and 🚲 Sustainability trends, prospects, and responses 📈. Fore more, check our webpage: https://lnkd.in/eh9g-KmP Umweltbundesamt - Environment Agency Austria #EPSIT, Epsilon Italia Gisat #Lechner Non-profit Ltd Norwegian Institute for Air Research NILU space4environment sàrl (s4e) Sinergise Universidad de Málaga, #ETCUMA Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Wageningen University & Research #enviroment #biodiversity #ecosystem
To view or add a comment, sign in
-