It's great to see this paper released about the opportunity (and hazards) for getting #BNG to deliver for #Invertebrates Kudos to David Goddard Richard Wilson Sophus zu Ermgassen et al for getting it out there #ecology
Ecological economist at Oxford Uni. Biodiversity Net Gain | Offsets | Infrastructure sustainability | Biodiversity finance. Advisor to UK govt & biodiversity strategy consultant. Co-host "Economics for Rebels" podcast
I get lots of developers, investors & lenders ask me how they can go beyond BNG legislation, do better. A super easy one: mandate no use of pesticides or herbicides in management of your developments. Check out Natalie Duffus's beautiful preprint on making BNG work for insect life here: https://lnkd.in/ev6uJfQG BNG uses a habitat-based proxy for biodiversity, the biodv metric. But basically, it measures what your habitat is, based mostly on physical attributes - not the life it contains. It is perfectly possible in BNG to deliver point-scoring habitats devoid of life. A BNG focused on maximising life would go beyond physical habitat indicators - & an easy one is making these habitats wonderful for insect life, which underpin all ecosystems. Yet BNG policy doesn't mention the use of pesticides or herbicides in estates management. This is an easy win for nature, & essential for making the link between BNG's simple biodv proxy (the metric), & real improvements in biodv. This post is inspired by Natalie Duffus's ongoing BNG work, & cos I'm reading Dave Goulson's books atm - a beautiful vision for making urban spaces a riot of life.
Director/ Principal Invertebrate Ecologist at Richard Wilson Ecology Ltd
8moThanks Gavin Ward. Plenty more thoughts and work on this to come.