In this sixth episode of our podcast “A View from the Bench,” Washington, D.C. partner George Jarrod Hazel and Houston partner Gregg Costa draw on their experience as both trial lawyers and judges to share their perspectives on what can help to win — or lose — a case at trial. In a lively exchange that includes substantial agreement as well as some notable differences of opinion, they consider the relative importance of opening and closing arguments, expert testimony, jury selection, cross-examination, the presentation of a defense, the use of visuals, and — in what has become an increasingly rare event — the testimony of the defendant. Their discussion is interspersed with numerous examples from cases they tried or presided over. “A View from the Bench” features George Hazel and Gregg Costa discussing their careers as judges, their return to private practice, and the current state and future of trials. https://lnkd.in/gfcpVBj7
Gibson Dunn’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
📢 New Podcast Episode Alert! 📢 🕕 When: 6 PM Today 📺 Where: YouTube (link in bio) Join us at 6 PM today for an insightful discussion on the Karen Read case trial, featuring our very own attorneys, Taylor and Therese. They will be diving deep into the trial proceedings, sharing their expert analysis on the legal arguments, and discussing the impact of the investigators' text messages.
-
-
📢 New Podcast Episode Alert! 📢 🕕 When: 6 PM Today 📺 Where: YouTube (link in bio) Join us at 6 PM today for an insightful discussion on the Karen Read case trial, featuring our very own attorneys, Taylor and Therese. They will be diving deep into the trial proceedings, sharing their expert analysis on the legal arguments, and discussing the impact of the investigators' text messages.
-
-
Check out the latest episode of the Greenberg Traurig, LLP Trade Secret Law Evolution podcast. My colleagues Jordan Grotzinger, Justin Victor, and I break down some of the important take-aways from the FTC’s new noncompete rule. Will the rule be blocked by a federal injunction? What can employers do in the meantime to prepare? Why is Justin in Alabama? These are just some of the questions we attempt to answer in 30 minutes.
-
The impact of amended Federal Rule of Evidence 702 on expert evidence admission practices and a progress report on the states adopting aligned rules, are the focus of LCJ’s inaugural Rules of Engagement podcast, offered as part of the “Fed Speaks” podcast series sponsored by the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel. Lee Mickus, a national litigator with Evans Fears Schuttert McNulty Mickus, joins LCJ’s Dan Steen to discuss how courts are using the newly amended FRE 702, tips on advocating for the correct application of the rule, and what you should know about LCJ’s amicus capability. Tune in to discover more about the newly amended rule: https://lnkd.in/est7qvRi. For additional resources on Rule 702 and to learn how to help change your state rules, visit www.lfcj.com or www.dontsaydaubert.com.
LCJ Rules Podcast with Dan Steen and Lee Mickus
traffic.libsyn.com
-
🎙️ Dive deep into the intricate world of agency independence within the executive branch! 🗣️https://lnkd.in/ej5FBJnb . 🏛️ Join Natalia Castro, Jason Briefel, and Adam White from the American Enterprise Institute as they unravel the historical evolution of our administrative state and discuss the critical role of the Supreme Court in shaping agency autonomy. . ✨ From dissecting the concept of independence for different agencies to exploring upcoming legal battles, this podcast episode is a must-listen for anyone interested in the dynamics of governmental power. Tune in now for insightful takeaways and expert analysis! #ExecutiveBranch #AgencyIndependence #supremecourt #podcastdiscussion #congress 🗣️✨
-
Fascinating episode. #RegentLawPodcast
Why is there such a discrepancy in the matters we put before voters? We're back with another feature from our Administrative State series. Check out all that Theo Wold, Director of the Administrative State Project for the Claremont Institute, has to say about the erosion of public input on Episode 9 of the Regent Law Podcast! Watch the full episode here: https://buff.ly/3AaJrfo
-
Public Speaker | Writer | Legal, Political & Cultural Analyst for Multiple TV & Radio Networks | Expert Witness (Investigations/Implicit Bias/Organizational Corruption)
Missed my weekly appearance on SiriusXM, on 'Tell Me Everything' with John Fugelsang? No worries! You can catch up by listening to the latest episode of the John Fugelsang Podcast! In this engaging conversation, John and I discuss healthcare, Judge Cannon, and orders related to Trump’s NY state criminal trial. If you're interested in those topics plus foreign policy and more, this episode is a must-listen. Check out the link: https://lnkd.in/gzgASZ-E #healthcare #law #politics #media #news #podcast
-
-
🎧 Listen now: https://bit.ly/43YoNu6 - Explore the art of cross-examination in international arbitration with J.P. Duffy and Rajesh Pillai KC (3VB). In this episode, the duo discusses strategic insights, preparation techniques, tribunal expectations, and question dynamics that lead to effective cross-examination. #podcast #InternationalArbitration #ReedSmithIA #StrategicInsights
-
Our podcast is essential listening for any business considering setting up in the UK. This episode (the 6th in our series) covers commercial considerations, expertly dealt with by my colleagues Sarah Taylor and Guy Cartwright #UKBusiness #LegalPodcast
🎙️ Catch the latest episode of our "Setting Up Business in the UK" podcast! Join host Sarah Taylor and commercial law expert Guy Cartwright, as they explore the top commercial priorities for businesses looking to trade in the UK and explain key aspects of UK commercial law that overseas businesses need to know. 🎧 Listen and subscribe here: https://lnkd.in/e4Bu37_E #UKBusiness #LegalPodcast #CommercialLaw
-
-
Partner at Reynolds Parrino Shadwick, P.A. Insurance defense attorney handling PIP litigation, appeals, and coverage issues. Also, a co-host for monthly PIP case law updates on Summarily- A Podcast For Busy Lawyers.
On our next PIP update episode for Summarily—A Podcast For Busy Lawyers, Robert Scavone Jr. and I will address this PIP case that went all the way up to the 5th DCA over TWO CENTS! (Like this case, the last case I posted about re: 1 cent at issue also came from Volusia County) There was an opportunity here to address de minimis issues that wasn’t taken. BUT, the new discovery rules starting in 1/2025, may at least help when defending these de minimis issues (discovery should be proportional to the needs of the case, what’s at stake, and the burden/expense compared to the benefit). I wonder how much discovery was propounded in this case over two cents? There was also a missed opportunity to insert a pun about the court giving its two cents!
-
