Grahame Jackson’s Post

View profile for Grahame Jackson

Partner at Hassans International Law Firm…podcaster (International Tax Bites) and writer on tax topics

Normally taxes are triggered by an event or some behaviour. A death... or trade... or the generation of income or a gain. Wealth taxes simply take things off people even if no event or behaviour occurs. Much closer to what an older generation would call "expropriation" than what is currently understood as "tax" That's a major conceptual shift for the UK. The proponents of such a change need to make a case for that which is stronger than "we want the money"... https://lnkd.in/d65ZVRZD

View profile for Leon Fernando Del Canto González

International Tax Barrister based in the Temple, London. Specializing in international legal & tax dispute resolution across the UK, EU, and Middle East.

Tax in the UK needs simplifying. The Labour Party plans to close non-dom Income & CGT, plus IHT loopholes on offshore trusts by abolishing transitional reliefs and ending 'excluded property' status. They also confirm no plans for a Wealth Tax or targeting expensive houses. Is this simple enough?

Leon Fernando Del Canto González

International Tax Barrister based in the Temple, London. Specializing in international legal & tax dispute resolution across the UK, EU, and Middle East.

10mo

A net assets tax in UK represents a significant shift from the traditional focus on income or transaction-based events, as suggested by Grahame Jackson However, a small duty on under-taxed assets (TBA) in addition to being a revenue policy, may activate the economy by disincentivize passive wealth accumulation, provided that the wealth tax is not charged on productive assets or investments as proposed by Stiglitz and Picketty at https://cgt.columbia.edu/news/top-economists-stiglitz-and-piketty-the-us-needs-a-wealth-tax-on-millionaires-and-billionaires/

Kiron Reid

Honorary research fellow University of Liverpool, UK; Honorary volunteer Professor, Zaporizhzhia National University, Ukraine

10mo

What is needed is a philosophical and economic basis to a tax policy. The comments so far are simplistic - this isn't framed as a hit the wealthy (they - Labour - mean 'the Rich', the kind of rich 'they' don't like), it isn't a 98% tax, but it is simplistic group think. 1. There is merit in the idea of taxing 'unearned' wealth, just as there is unfairness in wealth being passed on to successive generations, getting money they haven't earned. 2. But Labour in Britain seem to equate property and owning stuff with wealth and money (just as many old Liberals equate land with wealth) and fail to understand that people with property, land, assets, etc. are often not wealthy or rich. For me the same is the Labour and Tory addiction to unfair National Insurance . 3. National Insurace is a tax on jobs and working people that both Labour and Conservatives claim to oppose but utilise while always failing to get working age people off benefits in to work. 4. Labour and Conservatives both love unfair local property taxes - yes Poll Tax was wrong as not based on ability to pay but Labour believed in rates where people paid tax totally unfairly just based on the value of a property. tbc ..

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics