DVC @ MILA Uni. | Emeritus Prof. @ Uni. of Nottingham. Was CEO/Provost/PVC @ Uni. of Nottingham. #OR, #HE, Management, Leadership, Research Ethics. Views my own
This quote is taken from one of my articles. Follow the link to access the full article. #GXKSoundBite #EC https://bit.ly/3FdnJEP
DVC @ MILA Uni. | Emeritus Prof. @ Uni. of Nottingham. Was CEO/Provost/PVC @ Uni. of Nottingham. #OR, #HE, Management, Leadership, Research Ethics. Views my own
I am a believer in the Peter Principle and have witnessed it in action. The real problem I have with it though, is that I have never heard anybody admit that the Peter Principle is true of them, Perhaps more importantly, could I recognise if the Peter Principle applies to me now, or whether it has in the past. How would I know. What about you? Do you believe in the Peter Principle? Have you ever thought that it might apply to you?
DVC @ MILA Uni. | Emeritus Prof. @ Uni. of Nottingham. Was CEO/Provost/PVC @ Uni. of Nottingham. #OR, #HE, Management, Leadership, Research Ethics. Views my own
THIS! Read this! Proper reviews take time. Predatory journals don't review, they just publish and take your money. When I am asked, "Which journals review the fastest", my answer is always, "A review takes a long as the slowest reviewer - maybe a journal will take three weeks, maybe it'll take nine months (perhaps longer) - it's down to the reviewers." Okay, as Rüdiger Hahn says, perhaps there are things we can do to speed this up, but if we are going to have a robust scientific archive, due process must be done. Be patient and while waiting for that review to come through, start on another paper, .... and then another, ... and then ..... You might be interested in a page I maintain, which looks at all things to do with Publishing with integrity": https://lnkd.in/gwEg7JZp
The Reality of Peer Review: Why It Can't Be Done in 4 Weeks I often write here about the dangers of dubious, predatory or near-predatory journals and their so-called "peer review" processes. One of the most ridiculous aspects? They publish papers in just 4 weeks or less. That’s simply impossible if we’re talking about genuine peer review (for a "worst-practice example", see here: https://lnkd.in/eKrCSCYX). Let’s break it down: the peer review process is NOT just the time a paper spends with reviewers. There are many steps involved, including: 1️⃣ Editorial Processing: Before a paper even reaches a reviewer, the editor has to read it and decide whether it’s even suitable for review. This alone can take time. 2️⃣ Finding Reviewers: The editor has to identify suitable reviewers and invite them—then wait for them to accept or sometimes decline. If reviewers can’t take it on, they have to start the search again. 3️⃣ The Review: Once accepted, the reviewers need time allocate time from their busy schedule to carefully read and assess the paper. Many high-quality journals set a 2-3 week deadline for this, but thoughtful critique takes effort. Rushing this stage risks quality and the shorter the given time, the less likely it is that suitable reviewers will agree because they have other things on their desk as well. 4️⃣ Editorial Decision: After receiving the reviews, the editor has to read through them, evaluate the feedback, and decide whether to accept, reject, or ask for revisions. 5️⃣ Revisions & Final Publishing: The authors may need to revise their paper based on reviewer feedback. This can be quick or take more time, depending on the complexity of the changes. Then, it needs to be published! Bottom Line: This whole process cannot be rushed into a 4-week timeline. It’s simply impossible to do a thorough, fair (!), and scientific review in that timeframe. And that is why predatory journals are dangerous—they cut corners, and we end up with bad science. Yes, high-quality journals can be painfully slow. Reviewers sometimes nitpick, and even reputable journals occasionally publish weak papers (which even occasionally need to get retracted). However, the frequency of this in reputable journals is only a fraction compared to journals with fake or nonexistent review processes. But let’s not confuse these two problems. The long review times at reputable journals are an issue we need to work on (although this might require some more drastic changes in the system such as paying reviewers or other ideas which are being discussed). The "peer review" in predatory journals is a completely different—and dangerous—problem. Thus: Can we please not use the one as an excuse for the other and tackle both issues? Don’t let whataboutism distract you. We need to stay vigilant against flawed peer review practices that damage the credibility of science - and work on improving the other processes🔍 Image created with DALLE.
DVC @ MILA Uni. | Emeritus Prof. @ Uni. of Nottingham. Was CEO/Provost/PVC @ Uni. of Nottingham. #OR, #HE, Management, Leadership, Research Ethics. Views my own
For the last nine months, I have watched a mountain being removed at MILA University. It's good to see that there are now signs of our 12,000 seat sports stadium starting to emerge.
DVC @ MILA Uni. | Emeritus Prof. @ Uni. of Nottingham. Was CEO/Provost/PVC @ Uni. of Nottingham. #OR, #HE, Management, Leadership, Research Ethics. Views my own
Working on major revisions for a paper at the moment. It's proving to take a lot longer than I first thought, but I think I am 80% of the way there. One thing the journal wants is for the changes to be highlighted, and then make reference to those highlights in the response to reviewers. This is the first three pages (with corresponding highlights in the response document). I think it looks very messy, but if it helps the reviewers (and makes the process faster) then I am happy to do it.
DVC @ MILA Uni. | Emeritus Prof. @ Uni. of Nottingham. Was CEO/Provost/PVC @ Uni. of Nottingham. #OR, #HE, Management, Leadership, Research Ethics. Views my own
I asked ChatGPT "On windows 11 if you double click on a file the application opens on the desktop where the application is already running. Can you force it to open on the current desktop?" It said: "In Windows 11, when you double-click a file, it typically opens in the desktop where the application is already running. However, if you'd like to force the application to open the file on the current desktop (the one you're working on), there isn't a built-in Windows setting to directly change this behavior. But there are some potential workarounds: 1. Use Task View to Move the App to the Current Desktop You can press Win + Tab to open the Task View. Drag the application window to the current desktop manually. 2. Opening the File in a New Instance If you open a new instance of the application from the current desktop (instead of just opening the file), it will start on the current desktop. To do this: Shift + Right-click on the application's icon in the taskbar and select Open a new window. Once a new instance is opened on your current desktop, you can drag and drop the file into it. 3. Virtual Desktop Enhancements You can use third-party tools like Microsoft PowerToys to enhance virtual desktop management. While PowerToys doesn’t currently have a direct feature for opening files on the current desktop, it allows more control over your desktops, which might offer an alternative solution to streamline switching between apps and desktops. 4. Closing the Application on the Other Desktop If you close the application on the other desktop and then open the file again, it will open a new instance on your current desktop. Unfortunately, at the moment, there is no straightforward way in Windows 11 to force an application to always open on the current desktop when it's already running on another one, without using the steps or workarounds mentioned above." This is very frustrating. I wish there was a way (say Ctrl/Atl - double click on a file) to make it open on the current desktop, rather than the desktop where another instance of the application is running.
DVC @ MILA Uni. | Emeritus Prof. @ Uni. of Nottingham. Was CEO/Provost/PVC @ Uni. of Nottingham. #OR, #HE, Management, Leadership, Research Ethics. Views my own
I agree with many of them - in that I have heard them before and try to do them. Some are new (every day is a school day) and I will try to adopt at least some of them. Thank you Dennis - good post.
CEO, Epic Entrepreneur Media | Founder, Epic Biz Launch© | Business Strategist | Linkedin Trainer | Speaker | Follow for posts on Business & Life Mastery
20 atomic habits that helped me make a million dollars. They will radically change your life forever! Success is no accident. It is the result of hard, smart work done consistently for a long period of time. Most people can't pull it off, and they burnout. But, there are processes to make the ride smoother. 🚀 Here are my strategies for success and inner peace: 👇 ✅ Wake up 30 minutes earlier: ↳ Start your day with peace and extra time to set intentions. Why it works: → Allows for calm, unrushed mornings. → Sets a positive, productive tone for the day. How to do it: → Gradually set your alarm earlier by 5 minutes each week. ✅ Plan tomorrow, tonight ↳ End each day by creating a simple to-do list for the next day. Why it works: → Clears mental clutter before sleep. → Prepares you to hit the ground running in the morning. How to do it: → List the top 3 things you need to accomplish tomorrow. ✅ Drink water first thing ↳ Hydrate your body as soon as you wake up to jumpstart.. Why it works: → Boosts energy and kickstarts metabolism. → Rehydrates after hours of sleep. How to do it: → Put a glass or bottle of water by your bedside before bed. ✅ Take 5-minute morning walks ↳ Step outside for a brief walk to breathe fresh air. Why it works: → Increases circulation and mental clarity. → Enhances mood and provides peacefulness before work. How to do it: → Walk around the block or in a park for a few minutes. ✅ Read 5 pages daily ↳ Commit to reading 5 pages of a book each day. Why it works: → Compounds over time into significant learning. → Encourages consistent intellectual growth. How to do it: → Set a dedicated time, like morning or lunch, for reading. ✅ Check emails twice a day ↳ Limit checking your inbox to two specific times each day. Why it works: → Improves focus by limiting interruptions. → Helps you stay on task with more meaningful work. How to do it: → Choose two windows, like morning and mid-afternoon. ✅ Declutter for 5 minutes ↳ Spend 5 minutes a day tidying up your workspace or home. Why it works: → Clears physical space, leading to mental clarity. → Boosts productivity in a clean environment. How to do it: → Set a timer and organize or clean for just 5 minutes daily. ✅ Use the Pomodoro Technique ↳ Work in focused 25-minute sets, followed by short breaks. Why it works: → Enhances concentration and prevents burnout. → Breaks tasks into manageable, focused chunks. How to do it: → Set a timer for 25 minutes, then take a 5-minute break. ✅ See 12 more Atomic Habits in the carousel 👉👉👉 My favorite habit is getting up earlier... Which is your favorite❓ --------------- 🔔 Follow Dennis Berry for daily strategies ♻️ Repost to help your network grow 📰 Signup for the newsletter below #leadership #entrepreneurship #successtips
DVC @ MILA Uni. | Emeritus Prof. @ Uni. of Nottingham. Was CEO/Provost/PVC @ Uni. of Nottingham. #OR, #HE, Management, Leadership, Research Ethics. Views my own
Was nice to give a workshop recently on "How to write a survey paper?. Some (understandably thought they were going to hear how to carry out and publish surveys, whereas, I was going to talk about review (which I use interchangeably with survey) papers, based on literature reviews. Everybody stuck with me though (thank you) and I though the workshop went pretty well.
DVC @ MILA Uni. | Emeritus Prof. @ Uni. of Nottingham. Was CEO/Provost/PVC @ Uni. of Nottingham. #OR, #HE, Management, Leadership, Research Ethics. Views my own
It's the evenings and weekends when I do most of my work on writing papers. I sometimes think that I'll do some work on a paper during the day but the "day job" invariably gets in the way. When I have done a couple of hours writing/editing in the evening I often find myself thinking that it would be great if the "day job" was writing papers and, perhaps, mentoring others. I have no shortage of ideas, just the time to write the papers. Under this model, I would hope that I could publish a number of high quality papers each year, to the benefit of all those I was working with. Well, I can dream 😂.
DVC @ MILA Uni. | Emeritus Prof. @ Uni. of Nottingham. Was CEO/Provost/PVC @ Uni. of Nottingham. #OR, #HE, Management, Leadership, Research Ethics. Views my own
I talk about #7 quite a lot (work life balance). I am not a fan of the term as many see it as meaning that your work and private life operates in two separate spaces. but, in my experience, it is not like that. Work life harmony is a much better expression,as Natalia suggests.
Founder of LookInside | Senior Brand Leader with 15+ years experience @Google | Follow me for daily career & personal development tips
They say experience is the best teacher. But sometimes those lessons come with a hefty fee. Here are 9 brutal career truths, you won't learn in a textbook. In collaboration with Scott Caputo (give him a follow): 1. Your perceived value is more important than your skills. ↳ Don’t shy away from communicating your worth. 2. Loyalty to a company is rarely reciprocated. ↳ Always have a Plan B and keep your options open. 3. Office politics can trump merit. ↳ Develop emotional intelligence, not just hard skills. 4. Your network is your net worth. ↳ Build relationships not just when you need them. 5. Comfort is the enemy of growth. ↳ Seek challenges to develop professionally. 6. Your job title doesn't define your impact. ↳ Focus on the value you bring, not your position. 7. Work-life balance is a myth; seek work-life integration. ↳ Aim for harmonious integration vs the perfect balance. 8. Success often comes from timing, not just talent. ↳ Be ready to grasp unexpected opportunities. 9. Your career is a marathon, not a sprint. ↳ Focus on continuous growth. What did we miss? Let me know in the comments 👇 ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾ ♻️ Follow me Natalia Cano and reshare to help others
