In our latest article published in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, we reviewed the snakebite envenoming (SBE) therapeutics pipeline and antivenom market. Here’s what we found:
💉 We identified 127 products, which may seem sizeable, but this does not translate into a robust antivenom market. Some products have efficacy and safety issues, are expensive to produce, and many exist in a loosely regulated environment.
💊 We also found a diverse pipeline of 196 candidates, but progress is slow moving. Further investment and more diverse actors are needed to push candidates through clinical development and scale up
🕒 Antivenoms save lives and will continue to play a key role in the treatment of SBE, but our data validates a shift towards a dual R&D agenda: focusing both on improving existing antivenoms in the short to medium-term, and on developing more cost-effective and safer, next-generation SBE therapeutics in the longer term.
🤝 Achieving the short- and long-term priorities will require more coordination and consensus. Established governance structures could help funders and researchers to align on an R&D agenda, prioritise a portfolio of work, and better understand the community’s capacities and needs.
📣 We’re seeing unprecedented levels of R&D funding and exciting scientific developments but we will soon be faced with a stark funding landscape. Advocacy and evidence will play a key role in engaging funders to ensure SBE stays on the agenda, and innovations can reach those who need them most.
Read the article here: https://lnkd.in/gB2keeUR
Thanks to the co-authors, José María Gutiérrez, Cecilie Knudsen, Abdulrazaq Habib, Maya Goldstein, Andrew Tuttle; and the Advisory Committee, Ian Cameron, Nicholas Casewell, Andreas Laustsen-Kiel, Matthew Lewin, Devin Sok and Julien Potet
Funding: Wellcome Trust
General Partner @ age1, funding moonshots in longevity biotech.
2moCongrats Gijsbert Grotenbreg and team!!