businessline’s Post

How Congress is running the politics of fear around constitution? Majority of us do not know what the constitution is? And then we are running behind saving it. Then we do not know the struggles behind making it and the contribution of Babasaheb Ambedkar. Then the most important part - Congress ensured that Babasaheb Ambedkar doesn't enter the parliament by defeating him twice from Mumbai seat. The point about changing constitution, it was Congress's Indira Gandhi who suspended the Constitution. The reporters should ask the following questions to Rahul Gandhi 1. Why did his party defeat Babasaheb Twice? 2. Why did they not allow Babasaheb to enter parliament twice? 3. Babasaheb did not write secularism in his constitution why did Indira Gandhi go against him? 4. Why was Indira Gandhi's MP position cancelled? Because she did EVM ghotala of that time? BJP should not let Congress play on the things when Congress is actually the culprit. Why didn't Modi Ji ask all his MPs to take a copy of constitution and showcase solidarity that we beleive in constitution. If all MPs have s copy in their hand how would anyone target someone else?

Political parties are talking well, but they may change if they come to power, says Sanka Sujan Staff Correspondent Dhaka Published: 23 December 2024, 17:45 No matter how good political parties talk now, they may change again once they come to power, a fear was raised at a roundtable meeting in Dhaka. Speakers called on everyone to be vocal in demanding reforms. Citizens for Good Governance (SUJON) and The Hunger Project organized a roundtable discussion titled 'Reform Commission's Priority-Based Report: What Next?' at the Dhaka Reporters Unity auditorium on Monday afternoon. Calling on everyone to be vocal in demanding reforms, Badiul Alam Majumder, head of the Electoral Reform Commission and editor of Sujan, said that those who have committed crimes against humanity, economic crimes, and criminal crimes need to be punished to the fullest extent of the law. He also said that reforms are necessary so that dictatorship never returns. Many have already forgotten this. Some think that reforms will have to be done later. But deep reforms are needed so that fascism does not return. For this, public opinion must be created in favor of reforms. People must be vocal in demanding reforms. Regarding the High Court's ruling on the restoration of the caretaker government, Badiul Alam Majumder said, "One thing needs to be clear: a caretaker government will not replace the current interim government. The next elections will be held under the interim government."

Just by taking a small book in hand the CONSTITUTION OF INDIA CANNOT BE SAVED .RAHUL MUST READ HOW HIS CONGRESS HAS TINKERED IT TO SUIT THEIR personal problems. Emergency is the example .Read the post by PrasadRaje Bhopale .

New Post: Why is Nitish Kumar's JDU angry with BJP in Manipur? Why was support withdrawn? - https://lnkd.in/e3m2cZKP Nitish Kumar's party JDU has withdrawn its support from the Manipur government. Imphal: Janata Dal United (JDU) on Wednesday withdrew support from the BJP-led government of Manipur. In a significant political development, NDA constituent Janata Dal United) has formally withdrawn its support to the Manipur government. Now the only MLA of JDU in the state assembly will now sit on the opposition bench.This step of JDU has come as a change in the political scenario of Manipur. JDU had an alliance with BJP in the state since 2022. Now JDU has withdrawn its support from the ruling government. JDU's withdrawal of support in Manipur comes within a few months of Conrad Sangma-led NPP withdrawing support in November last year.It is noteworthy that in the year 2022, five out of six JDU MLAs had changed their allegiance to BJP, which further strengthened the position of BJP in the state.JDU has sent a letter of withdrawal of support to the Governor of Manipur.Despite JD(U)'s retreat, its move is not expected to pose any immediate threat to the stability of the Biren Singh-led government. The only MLA of JDU is no longer a part of the government. The BJP, which has a strong majority in the state assembly, is likely to retain its hold on power without any significant disruption. Source link

Commentary | The impending reforms of India’s Parliament are one of the effective solutions to tackle the democratic aberrations and the dangers of the lingering decline of the institution under one-party dominance. Moreover, the larger issue of parliamentary effectiveness, including the functioning and working of committees, and the impartiality of the speaker and the chairpersonship can only be dealt with instrumentalising radical parliamentary reforms in the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. https://lnkd.in/gR9BMAvf

My thoughts and observations on what has transpired in Indian parliament in 2024, and how unprepared we are for next year. #IndianLegislative #ConstitutionDebate #AdaniCase #UnpreparedFor2025 #IndianEconomy

Commentary by Rupak Kumar, PhD | The impending reforms of India’s Parliament are one of the effective solutions to tackle the democratic aberrations and the dangers of the lingering decline of the institution under one-party dominance. Moreover, the larger issue of parliamentary effectiveness, including the functioning and working of committees, and the impartiality of the speaker and the chairpersonship can only be dealt with instrumentalising radical parliamentary reforms in the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. https://lnkd.in/gR9BMAvf

What If India Had Only One House in Parliament? Imagine this: India’s Parliament with just one house—no Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, just one all-powerful chamber. Sounds simpler, right? But is simplicity always the best solution? Let’s break it down. The Lok Sabha is the voice of the people. Elected directly by citizens, it’s where governments are held accountable, budgets are passed, and laws are made. But it’s fast-paced and often influenced by the emotions of public opinion. The Rajya Sabha, on the other hand, is meant to be the calm counterpart. It doesn’t represent the people directly but the states. It exists to slow things down, to review and refine, and to ensure that hasty decisions by the Lok Sabha don’t turn into disastrous policies. But here’s the kicker—many argue that the Rajya Sabha’s role is becoming irrelevant. Critics say it’s more about party politics than protecting state interests. So, what if we just got rid of it? At first glance, a unicameral system might seem appealing. It would cut down costs, speed up decision-making, and simplify governance. No more “debates for the sake of debate.” But here’s the catch: without a second house, who’s keeping the first in check? Would a single house have the wisdom to balance short-term needs with long-term consequences? Would it give enough voice to smaller states or regional interests? History shows us the dangers of concentrating power in one place. Two houses mean two perspectives, two layers of debate, and a safety net against rushed decisions. Now, over to you. 👉 If India’s Parliament had only one house, would we be better off, or would we risk losing the checks and balances that keep our democracy intact? Let’s hear your thoughts—drop a comment and let’s debate!

41 Parties to Have MPs in 18th Lok Sabha; BJP and Congress Dominate with 339 Members | In a notable increase from the 17th Lok Sabha, where 36 parties were represented, the upcoming 18th Lok Sabha will feature representatives from 41 political parties In a notable increase from the 17th Lok Sabha, where 36 parties were represented, the upcoming 18th Lok Sabha will feature representatives from 41 political parties, according to post-poll data. The two largest parties, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the opposition Congress, will jointly hold 339 seats in the 543-member House. Specifically, the BJP will have 240 MPs, while the Congress will have 99. Despite falling 32 seats short of achieving a single-party majority for the third consecutive time (with 282 seats in 2014 and 303 in 2019), the BJP is set to form its third successive government […] https://lnkd.in/dd8Fp4ZV In a notable increase from the 17th Lok Sabha, where 36 parties were represented, the upcoming 18th Lok Sabha will feature representatives from 41 political parties, according to post-poll data. The two largest parties, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the oppos...

𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐎𝐧𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠: 𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐢𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐚𝐣𝐲𝐚 𝐒𝐚𝐛𝐡𝐚. Text of the 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐢𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧'𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐑𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐬 at the 265th Session of Rajya Sabha Posted On: 22 JUL 2024 12:22PM by PIB Delhi This session - the 265th Session of 𝐑𝐚𝐣𝐲𝐚 𝐒𝐚𝐛𝐡𝐚 marks a significant moment with the consideration of the maiden Budget by the newly elected government, now serving its third consecutive term, after over six decades, under 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐒𝐡𝐫𝐢 𝐍𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐫𝐚 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐢. Hon’ble Members, I am confident that this august House will expectedly lead the nation by example to calibrate the political path forward marked by moderation of discourse pledging to serve the nation rising above partisan interests. Undeniably there is need to lower the temperature in our polity. This House must reflect highest standards of sanctity, propriety and protocol of Parliamentary traditions that will be motivational for legislatures in the largest democracy and outside as well. World is looking up to us; let us live up to that expectation. Hon’ble Members, I have every hope that the proceedings of the House will be marked by enriching and informed debates, optimally utilizing the time for national benefit. Let us uphold the principles of 'Dialogue, Discussion, Deliberation, and Debate', fostering an environment conducive to robust parliamentary discourse and set an example before the nation. Hon’ble Members, I seek to draw your attention to another important and concerning aspect- many a time, Members’ communications to the Chairman find way to public domain and sometimes even before the same reach the addressee. This inappropriate practice of garnering public attention is at best avoided. Hon’ble Members, there is nothing beyond Bharat which we cannot achieve. Let us dedicate to ever keep Nation First, relegating partisan interests. No better place than this temple of democracy to begin. Let us all commit to act in togetherness for welfare of our people.