We are the leading specialist Court of Protection practice in the UK, with the largest team of qualified lawyers. We offer the commitment, personal support and speed of response that is often lacking in larger firms. Find out more about how we can help you here: https://ow.ly/HbeP50T1YFY
Hugh Jones Solicitors’ Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Following a great attendance at a webinar hosted last week by Katia Finkel and Nick Pinder on ‘Diversity and Equal Opportunity in Arbitration and Litigation’, they have continued their work in this area by writing an article for The Times. Diversity within business is an important issue that we’re all familiar with. And greater diversity within the world of dispute resolution will bring many benefits. Do read the full article if you have a subscription. #Diversity #legal #arbitration #litigation
Diversity in court proceedings and arbitration is an issue, particularly when it comes to the selection of expert witnesses, write Partners Nick Pinder and Katia Finkel in this article in The Times. Read now: https://lnkd.in/eiik2sdz [subscription needed]
-
-
A enjoyable part of PR is learning things I wouldn't usually come across. Katia and Nick opened my eyes not only to the lack of diversity in expert witnesses, but also the impact that has in the courtroom and on the legal system. A great piece of insight that might otherwise go unnoticed. But shouldn't go unnoticed. #PR #Legal #Law
Diversity in court proceedings and arbitration is an issue, particularly when it comes to the selection of expert witnesses, write Partners Nick Pinder and Katia Finkel in this article in The Times. Read now: https://lnkd.in/eiik2sdz [subscription needed]
-
-
We examined this issue in a recent event and the article below summarises some of the key takeaways from our excellent panel. #expertwitness #arbitration #litigation #diversityequityinclusion
Diversity in court proceedings and arbitration is an issue, particularly when it comes to the selection of expert witnesses, write Partners Nick Pinder and Katia Finkel in this article in The Times. Read now: https://lnkd.in/eiik2sdz [subscription needed]
-
-
"Young lawyers in our profession must confront the possible erosion or termination of the rule of law head on - and band together to protect it, regardless of discomfort, political views, or career risk." Read about the vital role of young lawyers in protecting the rule of law in the newest edition of The Chicago Bar Association Record. https://lnkd.in/gSagee2e
-
-
Our thoughts on the Commercial Court judgment in Czech Republic v Diag Human SE and a summary of the Court's helpful guidance on what must be done during an arbitration to preserve rights to challenge the award under Sections 67 and 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996: https://lnkd.in/e-39zcQk
A highly unusual case, spanning three arbitrations and over 26 years (so far), which involves some extraordinary allegations of interference in the arbitral process – the phrase “by the balls” does not feature often (enough) in English High Court judgments... In amongst that, the Court found time to offer valuable guidance to parties on what they must do during an arbitration if they wish to preserve rights to challenge the award under Sections 67 and 68, which Paul Stothard, Andrew Judkins, Olivia Fox, Jasmine Shepard and I discuss here: https://lnkd.in/e-39zcQk
-
-
Senior Associate Solicitor at Lester Aldridge LLP | Court of Protection lawyer | Property & Affairs | Health & Welfare | Family lawyer
Watch out for Poki Wratten’s and my webinar coming out next month!
Contentious Property & Affairs Issues in the Court of Protection - Develop Your Skills Our Senior Associate, Philippa Davies' webinar with Poki Wratten for MBL Seminars Ltd will be released on 15th February. Register to view here: https://lnkd.in/ewYwRPHQ
-
Group litigation/class actions are something we at Eversheds Sutherland advise on and we track developments closely in an ever changing landscape. Yesterday the Court of Appeal handed down an interesting decision which confirmed that “omnibus” claim forms (where there are multiple claimants on a single claim form) are allowed - but it depends on the facts of the case. Our briefing gives an overview of the judgment and it will be interesting to see what the Civil Procedure Rules Committee make of it
Although there is currently no dedicated class action regime in England and Wales, multiple claimants can seek similar relief through various means. Yesterday the Court of Appeal handed down an authoritative judgment which considers the circumstances in which it is permissible under the Civil Procedure Rules (“CPR”) for multiple claimants to bring claims in one claim form and one set of proceedings. In this article, we consider the background to the provisions under CPR, the judgment from the Court of Appeal and how this will impact group litigation moving forwards. Authored by Martin Ward, Laura Norris, Lara Satchwell. Read the full article here: https://lnkd.in/eWWsx8Eh #ClassActions #GroupLitigation Chris Busby Jennifer Miles
-
-
At Bedell, you can trust us to navigate the complexities of the law and keep you in the know. See some of the latest Florida laws for 2024: https://bit.ly/4bpLXwJ
-
-
Law student. Human rights Australia. *Disclaimer not studying Law to become a practicing solicitor/barrister.
Not guilty. I don't know if people outside the legal system understand how serious both a 'not guilty' and a 'guilty' verdict are. In my case some people certainly seem to get it confused. I'm continually issuing 'cease and desist' orders as some media companies and individuals still so many decades later try to perpetuate some bizarre sensationalised and utterly inaccurate narratives. Some even going so far as to intimate a 'Kill Bill' action scene. How that 'journalist' and 'author' could contribute to such a bizarre segment is beyond me, except I suspect at the time it was highly lucrative. The burden of proof is paramount. The DPP have endless financial and people power resources to try and prove their case. Whilst the defence (especially if done via Legal Aid) are often operating on a shoestring budget. Maybe, just maybe, a 'not guilty' verdict means exactly that. For anyone to suggest otherwise it is defamatory at best. Even criminal depending on the context.
Not guilty - This week our team heard that verdict twice as two of our hard-fought trials came to an end, each a powerful reminder of the painstaking efforts that go into achieving a just result. These outcomes are not just fleeting moments in courtrooms; they are the culmination of meticulous legal battles, diligent defence investigation, and the steadfast application of the rule of law. In any criminal trial, a "not guilty" verdict is more than a simple declaration. It reflects the rigorous standards of proof required to convict someone in a court of law—standards that ensure the protection of individual rights against the immense power of the state. The burden of proof lies squarely on the prosecution, and the defence works tirelessly to ensure that every aspect of the case is thoroughly examined, every doubt is explored, and every argument is meticulously presented. These verdicts serve as a reminder that our legal system, though imperfect, is designed to err on the side of caution when a person's freedom is at stake. These verdicts are not just victories for the defendants; they are victories for the principle that justice must be earned, not assumed.
-
As we hear about, and see, more of group claims and class actions in England and Wales which seeks to represent the interests of a range of individuals and entities, the Court of Appeal has handed down its judgment setting out when it is permissible under the CPR for multiple claimants to bring claims in one claim form and in one set of proceedings. For a summary of that judgment, please read the helpful article written by my colleagues Martin Ward Laura Norris and Lara Satchwell.
Although there is currently no dedicated class action regime in England and Wales, multiple claimants can seek similar relief through various means. Yesterday the Court of Appeal handed down an authoritative judgment which considers the circumstances in which it is permissible under the Civil Procedure Rules (“CPR”) for multiple claimants to bring claims in one claim form and one set of proceedings. In this article, we consider the background to the provisions under CPR, the judgment from the Court of Appeal and how this will impact group litigation moving forwards. Authored by Martin Ward, Laura Norris, Lara Satchwell. Read the full article here: https://lnkd.in/eWWsx8Eh #ClassActions #GroupLitigation Chris Busby Jennifer Miles
-
