about the discourse on truth
programming has nothing to do with language
the above two linguistic terms best to be kept fully apart, maintaining integrity of each one’s meaning and essentials
programming is digital & digitisational pool-recording of data in ladders/shapes-in-boxes for scientific use
language is free, out-of-the-box creation of concepts
& of interpretations of concepts of data in ladders/shapes-in-boxes and of themselves any ladders, boxes and science/technology pools
beyond-the-obviously-useful programmed memory: language is inherently seeking interpretation-in-freedom of anything in word discussion
Toward intelligent understanding of wild difference in tolerance and in the humility for ongoing discourse between extreme differences
Language, not excluding the imaginary myth, the mistakes, the intuition, the critical out-of-system judgment, the chance risk: values chance risk and decides individually, after diverse discussion, in intelligent understanding
Language may, or may not decide toward physical survival, like in the cases of atomic, or jointly decided heroism: e.g. wars protecting freedom and democracy
Furthermore, human intelligence is real and free by nature, suffocating within enclosure of revelatory oracle dogma; worst when politically-mathematically the latter is calculated to spread terror and obligation to peoples
On the contrary, artificial “intelligence” is fundamentally programmed and determined; to be used as recorded, obligatory pre-memory of scientific systems,
hence, it may be manipulated to be taken “religiously” into account.
Human intelligence is needed, to reach wholesome-critically valuable, rather, than plain mereological simulacra solutions in anything
Freedom, honesty and kindness make both intelligence and existence; on the fertile earth of which valuable progress arises.
A propos, isn’t artifice, by linguistic definition, the shallow fallow
shortcoming of intelligence? Unable, by force of insufficient brains, or by dishonest will, to solve problems, leading in the mime of knowledge?
So, another fair logical linguistic conclusion would be to drop the term “intelligence” by the term artificial and change the name AI into PP: Paraintelligent Programming.
A lot of circulating misunderstandings would be annulled, this way, regarding supreme and sublime powers of calculative constructions to find Absolute Truth, where human beings “can’t”.
Let’s, do call the emperor naked, as we see no clothes on him and call him marvellously dressed when the situation is really so.
Let’s leave the term intelligence where it belongs: with the thinking-in-suffering, incorrect-toward-critical truth wordie humans.
Today is Juneteenth.
On June 19, 1865, enslaved Black people located in Galveston, Texas, finally learned of their freedom from the slavery system in the United States. This came two and a half years after President Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863.
To honor this day, Unframed is publishing an excerpt of an essay by Dhyandra Lawson, our Andy Song Assistant Curator of Contemporary Art. In this essay, Dhyandra discusses “150 Portrait Tone” by Mark Bradford and “Injustice Case" by David Hammons, two works featured in our collection ↓
The Elusive Body: Mark Bradford and David Hammons
unframed.lacma.org