InsuranceAUM.com’s Post

🔍✅ 𝗪𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗘𝗾𝘂𝗶𝘁𝘆? 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗲 👇 📘 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗘𝗾𝘂𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄 This comprehensive overview is crafted to help investors understand the ins and outs of private equity, providing detailed insights and critical considerations for making informed investment decisions. 📃 𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 Private equity assets under management have grown over 12% annually since 2010, highlighting its increasing importance in institutional portfolios. The main strategies include leveraged buyouts (LBOs), venture capital, and growth equity, each targeting companies at different stages of their life-cycle. Private equity funds generate returns by selecting target companies and improving their governance and operations, with a shift from financial engineering to operational improvements. Buyouts have outperformed public equities by 3-4% annually, while venture capital and growth equity have underperformed by 1-2% annually on average. Investors must carefully evaluate fund strategies, costs, leverage, potential conflicts of interest, and ESG factors to ensure successful investments. 📊 𝗣𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 Market Growth - Understand the rapid expansion of private equity and its impact on global investment strategies. Investment Strategies - Learn about the different private equity strategies and which stages of company growth they target. Value Creation - Discover how private equity firms create value through active ownership and operational improvements. Performance Metrics - Evaluate the performance of private equity investments relative to public markets. Investment Considerations - Consider the high costs, leverage, potential conflicts, and ESG factors when investing in private equity. 𝘊𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘵: 𝘕𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘴 𝘉𝘢𝘯𝘬 𝘐𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘔𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 #PrivateEquity #Deals #Economy #Finance #Investments

How does the rapid growth of diverse-led firms and their success in early-stage investments epitomize the pivotal role of diversity in reshaping the financial landscape?   According to a study by Boston Consulting Group (BCG) published in 2024, which analyzed more than 84,000 US-based deals from 2018-2022, the value of deals led by diverse private firms grew at 25% annually from a starting point of $33B, nearly twice the growth rate of deals completed by non-diverse firms.   Research shows that despite the higher risk inherent in early-stage investments, diverse teams perform as well as their broader peer group of early-stage investors. This underscores the significant potential of diverse-led firms in driving innovation and accessing unique investment opportunities, highlighting the importance of #DEI initiatives in the industry.   At Daraja Capital, this is precisely our mission. Each day we strive to: ✓ Widen the aperture and identify investment teams that are typically overlooked by the mainstream to prioritize unique opportunities sourced by different perspectives. ✓ Help start-up and early-stage boutique alternative asset management firms achie­ve strategic capital and expertise to develop and grow sustainable enterprises. ✓ Target new funds led by investment professionals of color and women. ✓ Lower the barriers of entry for aspiring, diverse fund managers by creating opportunities to build intergenerational wealth.   By doing so we exemplify our commitment to fostering inclusivity, empowering diverse perspectives to drive creativity and uncover untapped opportunities for growth and success.   Read the full BCG study here: https://lnkd.in/ddKTwDKK #EmergingManagers #FundManagement #AlternativeInvestments 

Moving to a private equity fund owned company? or coming from a PE fund back ground to a classical operation firm? This is what you need to know to fit in quickly!!! Private equity funds are investment vehicles that pool capital from investors to acquire stakes in companies. The objective of a private equity fund is to generate high returns on investment by actively managing and restructuring the companies in which they invest. This approach typically involves a high level of financial engineering, including leveraging debt, cutting costs, and implementing strategic changes to drive profitability and increase shareholder value. On the other hand, a classical operation-oriented mindset focuses on operational efficiency and long-term sustainable growth. This approach emphasizes optimizing internal processes, investing in innovation, building strong customer relationships, and developing a competitive advantage in the market. Proponents of the private equity fund mindset argue that it brings a fresh perspective and expertise in financial analysis, restructuring, and operational efficiency. Private equity firms often have extensive experience in turnaround management and can quickly identify and rectify operational inefficiencies. They provide capital injections and strategic guidance that can help struggling companies overcome financial challenges and emerge stronger. Moreover, private equity funds typically have a shorter investment horizon, usually around three to seven years. This time frame creates a sense of urgency and focuses on short-term financial goals, which can drive swift decision-making and performance improvements. Critics of this approach, however, argue that the emphasis on short-term gains may lead to neglecting long-term investments, research and development, and innovation. In contrast, the classical operation-oriented mindset places emphasis on building sustainable and long-term value. It encourages a more patient and strategic approach, allowing companies to invest in research and development, human capital, and infrastructure. Critics of the classical operation-oriented mindset argue that it may lack the financial discipline and efficiency focus that private equity brings. They suggest that a more operations-centric approach can lead to complacency, lack of agility, and resistance to change. Moreover, in industries with rapid technological advancements and disruptive market forces, a slower pace of decision-making and adaptation may hinder a company's ability to stay competitive. Ultimately, the choice between a private equity fund mindset and a classical operation-oriented mindset depends on various factors, including the company's financial health, industry dynamics, growth potential, and the specific goals of the stakeholders involved. Balance is the key! #PrivateEquity #Operations #BusinessManagement"

Financial and Strategic Investors Find Common Ground The private equity and venture capital sector as a whole has seen a shift in recent years to a more hands-on approach. Increased competition between investors for quality companies and a less predictable and rapidly changing macroeconomic environment have prompted investors to be more involved in the businesses they invest in. Moreover, ESG campaigns and public pressure have also pushed investors to align their corporate views with those of their investments. Finding the advantage in a more crowded and complex investment market has become harder, and some investors are willing to invest in less ‘perfect’ companies given they can take on an active role in the business to steer them towards greater value creation. In many cases, this has made traditionally financial investors (PE, VC, family offices, etc.) take on many of the characteristics traditionally attributed to strategic investors. Most financial investors now offer both financial support and strategic advice as a way of winning deals and controlling the performance of their portfolios. Investors have taken steps to strengthen their industry connections and strategic networks, enabling them to offer more support to existing and potential portfolio companies, as well as to identify the best opportunities in the market. Moreover, many companies have come to expect investors to be able to provide value beyond a financial investment. The shift towards “doing it all” is, however, not just seen from financial investors. Strategic investors/acquirers have also taken a more flexible approach to their funding and M&A structures in recent years. Many corporates have built up corporate venture capital (CVC) arms, which in some cases operate practically independently of the core business, investing in companies only loosely related to the operations of the parent. In a number of cases, CVCs can invest without the explicit intention of acquiring the business for the long term. As a result, the industry is seeing a shift from both the financial and strategic directions towards a more active and flexible middle ground. This, in turn, means companies are benefiting from a more flexible investment landscape, where the “right” investor could come in a number of different forms. #investmentbanking #corporatefinance #corporateinvesting #equityfundraising #privateequity

𝐁𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧 𝐈𝐏𝐎 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐲: 𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐑𝐢𝐬𝐤 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐏𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐑𝐞𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐦𝐲 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐚𝐜𝐡 𝐭𝐨 𝐈𝐏𝐎 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: I've allocated a specific fund to invest solely in IPOs. This approach allows me to participate in this market segment without impacting my broader investment portfolio or lifestyle. As Parag Parikh highlights in "𝘝𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘦 𝘐𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘉𝘦𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘍𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦," IPOs often carry high PE ratios and coincide with bull markets. While some might view this as inherently risky, I'm prepared for the possibility of a 10-20% loss on any given IPO. 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐈'𝐦 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐤: In perspective, a 10-20% loss translates to Rs. 1000-2000, an amount I can recoup by adjusting monthly expenses. On the flip side, successful IPO investments hold the potential for 50-60% gains. This highlights the risk-reward nature of IPOs. Calculated risks can offer significant returns, and with a well-defined strategy, even potential losses can be mitigated. 𝐌𝐲 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐋𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐖𝐞𝐞𝐤’𝐬 𝐈𝐏𝐎: I invested in Indegene which is a life science company. I found their business model unique and decent financials, so I decided to invest in this IPO from my IPO fund which resulted in a listing gain of 28%. That means the value of my Rs. 15000 approx is now around Rs. 19200. 𝐊𝐞𝐲 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐲: Developing a targeted investment strategy, like my IPO fund, allows for calculated risk-taking within your investment portfolio. This approach can be applied to various investment strategies. 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐫: This is not a recommendation to invest in IPOs, but rather a glimpse into my personal strategy.

#BusinessLawToday | Careful exit planning is needed throughout the impact investment process to overcome challenges to a responsible exit and ensure lasting impact. Read: https://ow.ly/bAzw50QzASB Tom Morante, Carlton Fields Stephanie J. Bagot, RPCK Rastegar Panchal #BusinessLaw #SecuritiesLaw #MergersandAcquisitions #InternationalBusinessLaw

⚡Having just passed year end, how do I assess the Avonmore Developments angel portfolio performance? ⚡ I regularly categorise each of the portfolio companies into one of five groups: 1) Large market/Strong management team/Rapid growth/Profitable - Strong venture-scale potential. 2) Large market/Strong management team/Rapid growth/Unprofitable - Venture scale potential, but with financing risk. 3) Large market/Capable Management team/Growth slow or not yet proven/Marginal profitability or unprofitable - A profitable but not a venture-scale investment outcome still considered likely. 4) Market unproven/Management team suboptimal/Slow growth or lack of investor info - Uncertain outcome. 5) Too early or mainly valued for tax write off. ⚡Additional notes: - This list is both dynamic and (very) subjective, adapting to change. For instance, an investment completed in December 2023 is put as a category 5 as it is still too early to call. Likewise a company that was a solid 3 at the end of 2022 is being written-off as it failed to raise funding in 2023. - I use this categorisation to a) Track annual performance b) Assess opportunities for topping-up or profit-taking when they arise c) Project potential financial outcomes. - In the portfolio there are currently six companies in categories 1 and 2 (potential venture scale outcomes), eight in category 3 (profitable exit), five in category 4 (unsure outcome) and four in category 5 (too early or nil return) - Btw for investee companies, don't ask me which category you are in 😂 . Except for a couple of social impact investments, I am hoping everyone aims for categories 1 to 3! ⚡ This is just my approach but I am very interested in how others do it and where I can improve? Let me know 👍 #angelinvesting #portfolioanalysis

Few private equity players say they actively avoid hot sectors, but Flexstone Partners is of the view that PE investment is not about “hitting a home run every time” but securing doubles and triples every time it steps up to bat. #privateequity #InvestmentMagazine Natixis Investment Managers https://lnkd.in/gcpscUHK

In early-stage investing, it’s easy to get caught up in advice from industry pros. But their strategies might not always work for individual investors. Here’s why: 1️⃣ Different Goals: Professional investors are focused on returning capital to their LPs within 7-10 years. Your investment horizon and speed of capital deployment might be different, and so should your strategy. 2️⃣ Avoid Mental Burnout: Managing multiple startups can be exhausting, especially without a team. Overextending yourself can lead to mistakes and missed opportunities. 3️⃣ Invest Like a Fund of Funds: Instead of just picking individual startups, consider spreading your investments across different fund managers or syndicates (like ours!). This approach mimics a fund of funds and helps build true diversification through diversifying the deal selection process. Want to know more about crafting a sustainable investment strategy that we believe works better for the individual investor and makes investing more enjoyable? Check out the full article and sign up for more insights on early stage healthcare investing from The Healthcare Syndicate: https://lnkd.in/gN8pcmPd #Angelinvesting