❓
The Air Force has changed in terms of aircraft and their capabilities. It is increasingly working towards the role of a multi-role aircraft. But is this concept still up to date?
❗
The avionics of an aircraft have different capabilities/possibilities in their design. If I have a larger surface area to generate more lift, the maximum speed suffers as a result. Conversely, a more compact avionics layout makes it possible to generate higher speeds.
In my opinion, capabilities should not be dependent on the maximum performance of the carrier system, nor should this set the limits. The reverse should be the case. A capability that is to be used comes first, and the carrier platform should be designed accordingly.
⁉️
The financial aspect is clearly evident in the multi-role concept, but nowadays we see that the focus should be on a high-performance solution as opposed to a more cost-efficient one.
In the area of the F35, the Bundeswehr has again focused on a multi-role variant. In the Chinese armed forces, the J-20 Shengdu has been designed as a bomber/director for its exact purpose.
❓
Should there be a rethink here or is it still possible to maintain the quality of all capabilities despite the physical limitations of a multi-role concept?
#airforce #militaryaviation #concepts #F35 #J20 #multirole #innovation
Hope to see you guys there next year!