“Distinct interests that military academies may present,” said SCOTUS regarding race-based decisions in the military academy admissions process.
Note that the military academies DID NOT request to be omitted by the ruling, but were not part of the ruling by the conservative majority because, as the Department of Defense cited, “Army diversity is integral to ensuring national security."
Of course, the ruling was challenged against both the United States Military Academy at West Point, my alma mater, and the Naval Academy by the same group suing all things diversity, and last week, the challenge was rejected.
I have heard people say that ‘for a system to be unbiased, it must objectively select the best.’ Well, what does best mean? The person with the highest grades? Fastest 2-mile? Best obstacle course time? From my experience, I can tell you that the best people I served with didn’t always correlate with the highest SAT scores.
Is it possible to look at the programs themselves, #AffirmativeAction, #DEI, #ESG, and ask, how do we harness the value of diversity to ‘ensure national security’ instead of trying to act like it doesn’t exist?
If you are interested in the socioeconomic impact of diversity or curious about the data on such topics, follow Equity Quotient as we start to share more case studies starting in healthcare, and expanding from there.
Learning and Development Specialist/ Non-Profit Executive Director
3wAmazing!