John Surma’s Post

View profile for John Surma, graphic

Shareholder at Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

For those of you with a presence or employees in California, it seems the indoor heat illness rule may or may not be a thing (it is California, what can we expect?). Having said that, Robert Rodriguez and Karen Tynan, a couple of my favorite Ogletree Deakins colleagues wrote a blogpost explaining the situation (can anyone truly explain what California is doing?). Take a read and see if you can figure out where this is going. #odworkplacesafety #calosha #heatinjury #heatillness #california

Sean Lindley

Destructive Devices, Explosives & ITAR Consultant/Expert Witness | Entrepreneur | Firearms, Ordnance & Less-Lethal Manufacturer, Importer, Exporter & Dealer

6mo

Federalism is a great thing, where people can choose what type of government they want to live under within the limitations of the Constitution. If you don't like it where you are, you can move to somewhere more to your liking. "Laboratories of democracy" was supposed to foster innovation as states experiment with what works & doesn't. But California seems to have gone from an innovative state that others looked to for inspiration, into state equivalent of the The Wuhan Institute of Virology & spewing all kinds of terrible things into other states. I love visiting California, but I can't imagine trying to run a business out there.

Like
Reply
Greg Daugherty, CSP, OHST, CHST

Safety and Health Professional - U. S. Military Veteran

6mo

The most dramatic change I have seen recently in CalOSHA is their new lead standard PEL.

Like
Reply
Nate Arthur, CHMM

Hazardous Materials Management Specialist retired

6mo

Love to see Ogletree Deakins explanation

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics