Josh Gerben’s Post

View profile for Josh Gerben, graphic

Founder of Gerben Perrott PLLC / Trademark Attorney

Adidas has taken legal action to block FIVE trademark applications filed by LIV Golf to protect its “L” logo. The legal basis of Adidas' claims is that the LIV Golf "L" logo: “...incorporate[s] three stripes in a manner that is confusingly similar to the Adidas Marks in appearance and overall commercial impression.” The apparel company believes that consumers will confuse clothing products bearing the LIV Golf "L" with its products. So are the claims legit? It is going to be a tough case for Adidas. If you recall, Adidas recently lost a similar case against clothing maker Thom Browne. The jury in that case essentially found that Adidas does not have exclusivity to stripes on clothing. The most likely outcome of a case like this is a settlement agreement in which LIV Golf agrees to some limitations on how its "L" logo might appear on products, thus limiting the chances it would look like Adidas' stripes. So What do you think? Is it possible that consumers will confuse the two logos? You can read the full Notice of Opposition filed with the USPTO on Monday here: https://lnkd.in/grXqJT3s #adidas #liv #golf #trademarks

Shriya Misra

Principal Associate at Karanjawala & Co.

1y

Misc info: In India, Adidas has applied to the TM registrar for being considered a “well known mark”

John McKenzie

A trial lawyer who helps clients facing business, malpractice, and government disputes. Interested in trademark, copyright, and privacy law. Plaintiff and defense work. Curious. Persistent.

1y

Likelihood of confusion seems low to me; however I can understand Adidas wanting to ensure that the public does not confuse it with LIV Golf.

Rahul Jain

Vice President - Legal & Compliance | eCom, New Commerce & IPR - SME | TMA2256 | ex@Reliance; ex@Samsung; ex@Flipkart /Walmart; ex@Havells

1y

Adidas 3stripe seems generic in nature and 'whatsoever acquired distinctiveness it may gain with time' some or the other competition will try to tweak in 3strip and creep in it's monopoly territory. I believe their strategy from the word go is to settle matters/MOU and try to convince opposite parties to not squarely come in same description although identical class categories. For the customer confusion they shall either use addidas words attaching to three stripes which may increase the cost but then it may at least save the 3stripe logo which I belive may lost in darkness as number of such applications & opposition will increase in future similar to 3stripe logo as every competitor wanna take undue advantage of the settled brands reputational market.

Like
Reply
Vlatka Jukic

Legal and Compliance Manager / Helping companies earn and transform through legal expertise / Specialist in commercial contracts, negotiations & litigation / General Counsel / People Expert // strategy // public affairs

1y

This is interesting as the likelihood of confusion usually takes into account the distinction capabilities of an average consumer who is also likely to check out the writing on the label and not just the logo.

Avish Sharma

Founder at Prodigy Legal ⚖️ Litigation Strategist ⚖️ Business, IPR & Tech Expert ⚖️ Dispute Resolution & Arbitration ⚖️ Innovation Enthusiast ⚖️

1y

Tough task

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics