I recently came across the percentage criteria used by top Indian companies for their hiring process, and it got me thinking about its fairness. Often, the focus is on consistently high academic scores throughout one’s education, but does this really reflect a candidate's potential?
Let's consider two students as an example:
Student A: Achieved 90% in 10th grade, 90% in +2, 70% in graduation, and 60% in post-graduation. Despite a strong start, they faced challenges later in their academic journey, leading to a decline in their scores.
Student B: Had lower scores in 10th and +2 grade, improved to 80% in graduation, and reached 90% in post-graduation. This student showed consistent growth and continuous improvement throughout their academic career.
If we solely rely on percentage criteria, Student A might be favored initially, despite their downward trajectory, while Student B, who has demonstrated continuous improvement, could be unfairly filtered out. Both students bring unique strengths to the table, yet one might be overlooked due to rigid academic criteria.
I'm not saying I'm deserving among all, but I am better suited than those who might have been selected based solely on percentage.
Tata Consultancy Services
TCS iON
Infosys
Wipro
Cognizant
Tech Mahindra
Capgemini
HCLTech
LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech
I have experience in SAP ABAP , and , automotive SYSTEM TESTING ENGINEER
2moSystem testing engineer I have hands on experience UDS and CAN BUS Jira and doors My project are 1) BMS 2)radar srr