Decisions don't HAVE to be made or communicated during an interview...I'd rather you didn't.
Let me clarify. I work with some excellent clients who have great interviewers. If they realize during an interview that a candidate isn't suitable, they'll spend the rest of the meeting explaining why and suggesting ways to help them improve their techniques. This is recruiting gold.
However, I had conversations with three candidates last week. They'd all applied for different roles and excitedly told me they had good interviews, built rapport, and were progressing to 2nd or 3rd rounds respectively. Two were told who they'd meet next, and the third stated a call was being scheduled with the global COO.
As these were not my clients, I hoped to hear updates within the week [insert crickets]. Despite the candidates following up with each company/hiring manager, not one received a callback or an email with feedback on the roles' status.
You're messing with people when they are often at their most vulnerable.
It's OK to say you'll get back to a candidate (or their Recruiter) after reviewing your notes/ gathering your thoughts. If there's any doubt, don't feel compelled to give more than a high-level view of your recruitment process.
And, if, after the event there's a change in circumstances or requirements own up and just let the candidate know. Being accountable speaks volumes about your company's values and culture. Sticking your head in the sand and hoping they'll go away can only do untold damage to your reputation.
People advocate. Process pro. Pop culture nerd. | Building thriving organizations with people-first practices | Advisor to Overalls and Airvet
8moYeah, I feel like if you're using the call to get an understanding of where the candidate will need to grow, how you can be a good manager to them, etc. that is a good use of time. But if you're using it as a check the boxes exercise, might as well save your time!