LAist ’s Post

CJI instead of just preaching and sensationalism, What about the issue of hiring so called senior advocates to get relief from certain courts, From staff to judges, already knows whom to give preferences and dual nature of courts is main issue which is never addressed, for us even to get a RFA or RSA listed in high court it takes few weeks to months but so called seniors whose vakalanama is not even filed, matter is listed next day. Supreme Court stays Allahabad High Court judgment declaring Madarsa Act unconstitutional | https://lnkd.in/gEduTVN6 Acid Attack: Delhi High Court upholds acquittal of accused but orders ₹5 lakh compensation each to the victims | https://lnkd.in/gBf5YHji

I Can't Afford Bail, What Should I Do? The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution forbids the issuance of excessive bail. However, courts regularly set bail that is too high, and a defendant may not be able to pay and may need to consider other options. Read More: https://lnkd.in/gnmyZsxw #criminaldefense #dui #lucklaw

Constitutional amendment bet fails as Fazl & PPP backs https://lnkd.in/gaAQhH-k

If passed, amendment 2 would establish a state constitutional right to hunt and fish. Check out the full 2024 Florida Amendment Guide to learn more about amendment 2: https://lnkd.in/ez4sAf7V

https://lnkd.in/grcf5rEq "The Constitution of the United States contains a preamble and seven articles that describe the way the government is structured and how it operates. The first three articles establish the three branches of government and their powers: Legislative (Congress), Executive (office of the President,) and Judicial (Federal court system). A system of checks and balances prevents any one of these separate powers from becoming dominant. Articles four through seven describe the relationship of the states to the Federal Government, establish the Constitution as the supreme law of the land, and define the amendment and ratification processes." #NationalConstitutionDay #UTSAEngaged

PNG's founding fathers, thru the then Constitutional Planning Committee, foresaw that the chances of tampering the Constitution by any person or entity including any Government of the day, are inevitable hence they've strategically placed a weapon in the Constitution itself to deter the temptation of breaching it. That weapon is provided for under Section 23 of the Constitution, where it provides for penalties for any breach of the provisions of the Constitution. Thus, whoever sees fit to breach any provisions of the Constitution will be penalized by way of imprisonment or fine, depending on the nature and extent of such breach.

"Exciting updates on the horizon! Here’s a sneak peek at the draft of the upcoming constitutional amendment. Stay informed about the changes that could shape our nation's future! #ConstitutionalAmendment #LegalUpdate #PolicyChanges #StayInformed"

Doctrine of Severability: The doctrine of severability means that when some particular provision of a statute offends or is against a constitutional limitation, but that provision is severable from the rest of the statute, only that offending provision will be declared void by the Court and not the entire statute. discuss in 2012 PLD 923 SUPREME-COURT

H/T Tenth Amendment Center. So true. Take it a step further. Legislatures have a moral duty not to write unjust/unconstitutional laws. Enforcers have a moral duty not to enforce/prosecute unjust/unconstitutional laws. Courts have a moral duty to strike down unjust/unconstitutional laws. All three fail miserably at this task.

Our yearly review of developments of the case-law on private enforcement of EU competition rules is out (https://lnkd.in/efpdXT2v). Of particular note is the signal given by the Court of justice that its willingness to rely on the principle of effectiveness to interpret rules in ways that promote private enforcement does have limits, in particular when dealing with jurisdictional issues.