Levent Özen’s Post

⚡ Carlo Ancelotti makes important statements about the transfer period. All the details about the team's future, potential transfer targets and strategies are in this article!

A long read on why Roberto De Zerbi is currently out of work. With colleague Dan Sheldon. https://lnkd.in/eB-v-n3E What now for Roberto De Zerbi?

A comprehensive analysis of the Italian serie A 2023-2024. This data story encompasses the strength of Inter Milan (champion) and the weakness of the other teams. #Lifeofadataanalysis 😂😂.

Come chat with the HDI team at Booth 325 to learn about our appetite, capacity & more about what we do! See you in Vancouver at #RIMSCanada #HDIGlobal

Report by Owen Jones

https://lnkd.in/dxZDuE22 (orig.: Taylor edges out Serrano in controversial decision) #WORLDNEWS # (orig.: #https://lnkd.in/dxZDuE22 #Taylor #out #edges 🗞️🤓👉 https://lnkd.in/dxZDuE22

watch our latest video on Various Committees of CDSCO

What is the difference between wanting to be right to be validated versus getting what we want? I was fascinated by Felix vs Draper controversial point (link below). Felix returns a ball, Draper hits the ball with his racket and bounces off the ground, which would be considered a bad hit. Everyone wants to get this right. Felix: (to the referee) - Looking for validation: are you 100% sure it was a good return? - Manipulation: this is going to be on TV, are you sure. Draper: - (to almost everyone): I am willing to replay the point; I am not sure what happened. - (to the referee)(not wanting to own his action): it's your call. Referee: - I saw the ball bounce up, I did see that (not bounce off the floor or racket) In my opinion, Felix could have easily replay the point (although anyone could argue he had won it already) but he chose to not accept Draper's offer to replay it. If he would have, this would have been not much of a big deal. Instead, Felix chose to honor the referee's call and lose the match. Unfortunately, I don't believe this is what he wanted. The language of choice allows us to connect and if Felix would have chosen to replay the point, it is possible he could have won it. In sports, we always say, the ball never lies. Imagine, if Felix would have said, Draper, I appreciate and accept the offer to replay the point. The odds are Felix would have been happier. So I wonder, what went through Felix mind to want to change the referee's call or judgment over accepting Draper's offer? There is no wrong or right choice here. There is the choice to get what we all want and I think everyone in that game left misunderstood, Draper as a cheater, which he was not, the referee as being wrong but even with the video it is hard to tell, the referee did the best he could and Felix, he lost the match on a controversial point. This is the language of wrongness, always wanting go be right! Are you aware when you use the language of wrongness? https://lnkd.in/gJsHtcvW