MacMan, Inc.’s Post

Is this a “NEAR MISS or an ACCIDENT”……? Let’s share knowledge in the comment section

I Just do Some Examples Please Check this:

When you try to express the whole idea in one single diagram...

Here's trouble.... at 26:12 into the True to The Core session, Andrew Russo steps up with some great questions. https://lnkd.in/ge-N-rWx

The recording of my talk "Inner Workings of Safepoints" (based on https://lnkd.in/e3RYwpE9) is out: https://lnkd.in/eDt7XWpZ

The (big) cat is out of the bag. https://lnkd.in/eRmPXE3V

Very simple explanation of the current situation...

Reynolds frame work for a control volume can be applied to the disturbance in mind (🥹🥹🥹😐)

Is this small-cap rotation a good or bad sign? Let’s examine a few arguments. https://buff.ly/4bKDByE

I strongly believe that “the system as working” is the most important thing. Being able to observe and describe the system IS the job—otherwise you’ll never be able to operate or change it. Diagrams are one way to describe the system. They should *not* be treated as “documentation for how the system works”. It’s a map. Not the territory. Only the system tells you how it is actually working (or not), not the diagram. Draw maps often, be practiced enough to be able to do it quickly. And delete them, often. Because maps are always wrong.