Magnus Hornø Gottlieb’s Post

View profile for Magnus Hornø Gottlieb, graphic

External Affairs Manager | Ørsted

Weekly power simulation, week 6 of 2024 Another very windy week, almost exclusively powered by renewable energy. Interestingly, Thursday night saw wind and solar generation drop to almost zero for a few hours. Here, the model's five hours' worth of storage kicks in to fill the gap. But what's important is not so much whether the storage can fill the gap entirely - what's important is its ability to reduce the need for other generation or imports. In this case, the shortfall is reduced from app. 8.4GW to 3.2GW. By no means a trivial task, but there's a huge difference between needing 3.2GW, and needing 8.4GW. ----- Each week, I run a simulation using real-world generation data from the Danish power grid, with #windenergy and #solarenergy scaled to match future (2033) capacities, as forecasted by the Danish Energy Agency. See earlier posts by searching for #WeeklyPowerSimulation The original idea for such a simplified, but very illustrative, simulation is David Osmond's from Australian Windlab. His version is found on twitter here: https://t.co/5Y3UiKB5Di

  • No alternative text description for this image
Nicolai Hanssing

Automation Engineer, N-Control

7mo

I really would like to see two "batteries". One with 2 TWh hour capacity representing export and import from Scandinavian hydro-energy over a year. Say we use only 50% (or less?) of our 3.6GW connections to model constraints in low VRE scenarios. And then your normal battery. Over a year we would end up net exporters to Scandinavia, which would be fine, and keep our buffer filled. Also looking at the demand, I really can't see the flexiblility "flex down" and "flex up" that you have alluded is included in the model? (See your 23W48 post).

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics