https://lnkd.in/gpDykX-8 🔍 Unethical Hiring Practices in Design Challenges I am deeply frustrated and disappointed to share that I had a similar experience with a design challenge that took a troubling turn. 🚨 To my dismay, the company not only used my work without permission but also replicated it in their core project. The lack of changes, identical layout, and even copying of my work are disheartening. I believe it's crucial to address such unethical practices within the design community. Has anyone encountered a similar situation or heard of someone successfully taking legal action against a company for such actions? Let's advocate for fair and respectful hiring practices to protect vulnerable designers from exploitation. 🛑💔 #DesignEthics #UnethicalHiring #DesignCommunity #StandUpForDesigners
Manel Costa’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
To all designers in my network, how will you perceive a company if they offer a paid task as a first round (i.e. post CV, Portfolio shortlisting)? Given the shady hiring practices especially in the design domain, there's a big trust deficit nowadays. And thus, if a company is open to compensate for the efforts, I do think this is definitely a green flag. And thus it was a bit surprising to see Designers finding this as a scam. Context: Check this Reddit post https://lnkd.in/gt5r-VV4
From the UXDesign community on Reddit: First Round
reddit.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
For sure a relatable read. I definitely see the process of having structured tasks still being at the forefront of design. Not necessarily anything wrong with this if this is your process, but the grasp of holding on to just this process has hindered the design world to be relevant. "..driven by a desire from businesses to turn design into a process-heavy, measurable function, we’re filling our time with checklists instead of focusing on the very thing that makes designers relevant: our ability to propose new points of view and delight users with meaningful experiences". My Independent Study at Parsons Executive Education explores the structure of where ideas come from within companies. Yes ideas can from anywhere, but we have to ask who is executing them, for what purpose, and what are the core competencies for execution; this in itself may be one of the most challenging dichotomies to progress and innovation.
Design, Community & Professional Development | Senior Director of Learning & Programs, AIGA | Cofounder, Foossa | Content Creator, Educator & Facilitator
"driven by a desire from businesses to turn #design into a process-heavy, measurable function, we’re filling our time with checklists instead of focusing on the very thing that makes designers relevant: our ability to propose new points of view and delight users with meaningful experiences. These core competencies that were inherited from graphic design have been replaced with a poor man’s version of an anthropology major where the act of design is mostly based on averaging user opinions." – Rune Madsen, "Product Design is Lost" https://lnkd.in/efapUEzf
Product Design Is Lost / Design Systems International
designsystems.international
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Helping companies transform digitally | User Experience, Human centered design | 10+ IxDF certificates | Ex- Xebia
Question for all fellow Designers!! How do you seek feedback on your work on a professional level? Apart from obvious friends, family, and co-workers. Help fellow designers seek honest and unbiased feedback. Help them grow. #productdesign #designcommunity #feedbackmatters #learningandgrowing #learndesign
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I've always been against design challenges for this exact reason.
This is a horrible common practice in interviewing designers: - Introduction call with a CTO, CPO etc. - Given a take-home task. Which is of THEIR product. - The team will review internally. - Maybe come back with feedback. - Interview another 2-3 rounds. I don't mind tasks when done properly. What I care about is: - Companies exploiting designers for their skills on their product, without paying. In this market where many great people are going for the same role, if a company does this to 4-5 people they have so much free work. - I will never accept a for-profit company doing this to people. - Single parents, people caring for family members for example DO NOT have time to do extra work outside of a very busy schedule. Tasks should be done on a different product/service, timeboxed, and understand caveats i.e no access to customers to inform design decisions.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚧 "Who are we leaving out?" The design systems we’re building have the power to establish the patterns that either engage or exclude the people who need the services they support. As an example, our team works with traditionally marginalized communities seeking affordable housing and public benefits. As system designers, how can we be more intentional and provide guidelines that remove barriers for people who have historically been excluded? → Principles, at the highest level, can align stakeholders and team members around a shared set of inclusive values. → Foundations like color and type, are where there’s a lot of resources out there to guide folks towards critical design elements like color contrast. From here on in, it gets more complicated… → Content guidelines have the power to open our services up to more people by addressing reading level, a supportive voice and tone, as well as inclusive language. How do we make sure we're allowing content writers and strategists to be treated as contributors? → Component guidelines need to provide accessibility notes on how to ensure things like proper keyboard access for interactive elements, focus states and markup. WCAG guidelines get very technical very quickly. How do we help designers and engineers speak the same language? → Patterns capture use cases, such as sign in flows, that are much more about human behavior and can risk causing cognitive and emotional stress if we don't provide additional support. How do we assist the team with repeatable and equitable usage guidelines or "recipes"? 💎 Our team is continuing to learn from the vast resources out there. Some highlights include: 🎙 Systems of Harm by Amy Hupe provides a deep dive into many of the risks involved in creating design systems including how to mitigate bias and provide accessibility training for teams. Do yourself a favor and listen to every episode. https://lnkd.in/gt5pnt2E 🎛 Patterns via USWDS are a well spring of examples of how to implement inclusive patterns when designing for government services for folks who are the most in need. https://lnkd.in/gdxmy9Qx We hope to share more soon about specific learnings and resources our team at Exygy creates that might help other teams be more inclusive. #designsystems #inclusivedesign #accessibility #patterns
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
“The Skilled Domain Expert,” the one who’s like an encyclopedia on your subject matter! You can read her full description is on article “10 types of designers worth hiring in 2024” that’s droppin tomorrow, Jan 11 on the Bitovi.com blog! #ProductDesigners #DesignerPersonas
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Tomorrow I'll give a presentation on design quality at Front-end Conf here in Florida. This is the first time I've spoken on such a topic in a live, public format. Here at the event I've been humbled to hear several people say "I'm excited for your talk." Quietly in my head I'm replying "Me too. I have no idea how this will turn out!" Par for the course with new material. 😎 I've said before that my benchmark is 1 hour of prep time per 1 minute of speaking time for a new talk. This is a 45-min talk and I'm on pace for ~45 hrs of prep time. I won't have all the answers tomorrow but we'll explore: – What is design quality anyway? – Why is it so hard to achieve? – Where do we go from here? This is dialog I hope to see more of in the industry. It's long overdue. I'm holding myself accountable to share more, too. Let's see how tomorrow goes first. #frontendconf
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
While broad, this article makes some great points to consider.
Some strong arguments in this article by Rune Madsen about why the field of product design has "lost its way" in his words: "Design workflows at most tech companies follow an incredible number of structured tasks... These concepts originated in the service design industry and initially helped facilitate a very human-focused design process – which, of course, is good. "However, driven by a desire from businesses to turn design into a process-heavy, measurable function, we’re filling our time with checklists instead of focusing on the very thing that makes designers relevant: our ability to propose new points of view and delight users with meaningful experiences. These core competences that were inherited from graphic design have been replaced with a poor man’s version of an anthropology major where the act of design is mostly based on averaging user opinions. "Design is both an objective and subjective art. But because of a persistent fear of making bad decisions, businesses have ended up leaning so heavily on objective measures that we have severely limited our ability to create meaningful impact within organizations." While Rune's article isn't focused on solutions, his articulation of the problem left me nodding my head in agreement. If there is a constant in the field of product design, it is this: We will spend our entire careers reminding, educating, and evangelizing why design exists. Which, in truth, is "our ability to propose new points of view and delight users with meaningful experiences." Well said, Rune. #productdesign #thewhy
Product Design Is Lost / Design Systems International
designsystems.international
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I'm not a vision board person but I am a post-it note addict. On one of those 'wish list' post-its is a #DesignSystem series. Why? Because some of the most intelligent, gifted, kind and funny people I have ever met were the #AUGold team. Yes, it's been years but those memories stick. These developers, accessibility experts, designers and all round good 'community' people came together and created something awesome. They did, and do more than that, they 'Do the hard work, to make it simple' for others. Dominik Wilkowski Gary Broadbent Alex Page Trevor Brennan Patrick De Young Adam Zerella Raj Ghuman Kiri Hoy Brendan Ng (sorry if I missed anyone) In some kind of tribute and also keeping the stories and lessons alive, the #DigitalProfession will showcase different design system case studies. If you know of someone or a team we should highlight, contact me. #Respect #Developers #Designers #Leverage #ThisIsContinuousLearning
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Want feedback and advice on your portfolios? Get yourself signed up for the next round of portfolio reviews with Bea and Dan👇
Industrial designer and business leader | Passionate about user centred design and regenerative innovation.
Are you our next cohort? Having now met, and helped, over 50 amazing aspiring designers as our first #portfolio clinic cohort, we are now inviting applications for our second cohort. Are you struggling with your #design portfolio, need help selecting your best work or crafting the narrative behind it? We are here for you! We are hosting a series of informal, remote drop-in clinics with our team. This is a chance for you to present and chat through your work and receive direct feedback from our designers. The small, open and inclusive format also allows you to present to an international peer group, allowing you to learn, share and gain confidence as a designer. Ready to elevate your portfolio? Drop us a line via hello@rodd.uk.com and we will be in touch. If you know anyone who might be interested, share this on. B #designstudents #designcareers
To view or add a comment, sign in