Thanks for sharing the article Amie Hansen, it was very thought provoking. I think there is a lot to unpack here: 1/ Marketing certainly got complicated over time. Articulating the incremental value has never been more important. 2/ CMOs from different pedigree - brand / growth / pmm being a few - are adapting differently to the changing reality. I bet the CMO tenure and the collab at the c-suite varies a lot by the pedigree and the CMOs ability to speak to investments and returns. 3/ There are always going to be intangibles in marketing - especially in an ever changing world - that are hard to quantify. The rest of the c-suite understanding and accepting that is an important factor in leadership being aligned. 4/ The fact that CMO roles getting eliminated or that their tenure is getting shortened over time or that fractional CMOs are a real thing (there are no fractional COOs or CFOs) can’t be good for the future of the CMO role. Obviously I disagree with the generalization that it is a testament to the role getting complicated - latter is true but former is a result of a combination of above factors. Cc: Pranav Piyush Ben Dutter who always have really good takes on the value of marketing
CMO | Fractional CMO | Data Obsessed | CFO Whisperer | Wharton MBA | DTC, CPG, Pet, Beauty | Nike, Converse
This is a must read not only for marketers but for their peers: “Marketing a brand today is far more complicated than just managing marketing communications,” Allen Adamson, brand consultant and co-founder of Metaforce, said, adding that the job can be “too nebulous” for one person. “To some extent, it was built for a time when marketing was mostly marketing communications and you could manage that around the globe. [What’s happening now] is less about the CMO not being an important role and more that there’s just so much of it that it has to be split across many different people.” https://lnkd.in/edSbkY3S #marketing #cmo