Matti Junila’s Post

Things are getting interesting... As the music lawsuits heat up, AI Music platforms Suno and Udio are finally admitting to using copyrighted music for training their AI models. Their argument is "Learning is not infringing. It never has been, and it is not now." and that their training methods fall under fair use and accuse major record labels of stifling industry competition. I think the music industry is in the midst of another Napster level event with the movie industry following up. I also think there is a lot of potential for some unknown startup platforms who will monopolize on the outcome of this. What are your thoughts? https://lnkd.in/eQpQx4D9 #ai #aimusic #artificialintelligence

Music Giants such as Sony, Universal, and Warner, three powerhouse record labels have... taken legal action against AI music generation companies Udio and Suno. Moreover, the music labels allege that these AI companies used copyrighted material without permission to train their AI systems. Here’s the TLDR: 1. Protecting Copyrights: Sony, Universal, and Warner are suing Udio and Suno for allegedly using copyrighted material without authorization in their AI music generation. 2. Struggle Between Art and Innovation: These lawsuits highlight the ongoing tension between traditional copyright holders and emerging AI technologies, specifically regarding how AI systems are trained using copyrighted content. 3. Legal and Financial Consequences: The record companies seek legal recognition of copyright infringement and compensation for damages, underlining the financial and legal stakes involved. Quick Question: Do companies like Udio, Suno, and others have the right to use copyrighted content to train their models? If not, then what would be a solution? BTW, I share more AI Topics, Trends, Tools, Opportunities, and more in my Ai101x Newsletter (link in bio) Follow Brian Com for more AI Hot Topics === #ai #artificialintellence

Recently, AI music companies Suno and Udio have been hit with lawsuits over their data sourcing practices. This highlights a critical issue in the AI music industry: the ethical sourcing of training data. At Staccato, we have always prioritized integrity and transparency. Our AI models are trained exclusively on open-source MIDI files and original music created by our founder. We believe in the importance of creativity and ethics in AI development. Unlike some companies, we do not and never will use copyrighted music from platforms like Apple Music or Spotify. We are committed to setting a higher standard in the AI music industry. Let's continue to innovate responsibly and uphold the values that drive genuine creativity. #AIMusic #EthicalAI #Innovation #MusicIndustry #Staccato https://lnkd.in/em-swBAQ

What are your thoughts on ethical and fair practices in machine learning and AI when it comes to music and similar creative arts? Priyanka Khimani has a very important point here, particularly in the context of the Indian music industry.

To most of us actively involved in advising on AI, this was inevitable. I often hear founders of AI and music tech platforms in India make comments about how they’ve used music that belongs to “their friends”. It is as if somehow that’s ok, not having to pay for their music or have authorisation. For most artists in India, they’re either on a payroll or receive a very minimal flat fee. Indian artists have historically seen so much heartache over “one-time lumpsum payments” for decades. We just about started to move away from it with the 2012 amendments, a more robust streaming and distribution ecosystem, and the wave of non-film, independent music. And yet, with overreaching AI and music tech companies in India, rights holders and artists should feel like they’re back to square one. At this point, most music creators and owners have not yet realised how devasting this commercial practice could be for their future. It’s still not too late for those innovating in AI. Get the right counsel you need for technology to create and help maintain an equitable ecosystem. https://lnkd.in/dbhJYc5z

Pioneering Legal Challenge: AI in the Music Industry Universal Music Group, Sony Music, and Warner Records have initiated copyright lawsuits against AI companies Udio and Suno for using copyrighted music to train their AI models. Highlighted by Reuters as the first of its kind, these lawsuits signal the music industry's proactive stance against the challenges posed by music-generating AI, potentially reshaping the future development of generative AI in creative fields. As the industry navigates these technological advancements, it's crucial to consider the implications for both creators' rights and ethical AI use, ensuring a balanced approach for all involved. Ars Technica Benj Edwards Danny Goh Mark Esposito, PhD Terence Tse, PhD #MusicIndustry #CopyrightLaw #ArtificialIntelligence #TechNews #Transparency #EthicalAI https://lnkd.in/gF8G9f_A For more discussion, please visit https://lnkd.in/gqDPtry3.

We have to hope that if negotiations occur - as they should - that pass through for artist royalties (mechanical and recording) yields more than 10^(-4) per “play” (tokenization, call, sample, etc. etc.). Something tells me artist/rights societies like SoundExchange , The Mechanical Licensing Collective , ASCAP (etc., etc.) are going to have to put feet on the dais in addition to/in concert with/in spite of whatever the majors do re: licensing for generative AI.

Thanks to the Neuron daily newsletter: Major record labels have started to sue Suno and Udio for training their models on copyrighted material. This will be an interesting case to watch as it could easily have a knock-on effect on other LLM's and the data used to train them - just because information is publicly accessible on the internet, does not mean it is not copyrighted. "Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment and Warner Music Group, among others, filed lawsuits Monday against Suno and Udio-maker Uncharted Labs, both of which recently released AI programs that enable users to generate songs from text prompts." This follows a recent action by Sony Music Group (SMG) sending letters to 700 GenAI companies, warning them NOT to use SMG content in the training of their models - unless they license it first. Lawsuit: https://lnkd.in/gqJtC7q4 SMG letters: https://lnkd.in/g2KuiBsN #GenAI #AIMusic #AICopyright #GenAILawsuit

Sony Music Group has issued warnings to over 700 companies against using its music for AI training without permission. Their Declaration of AI Training Opt Out supports technological innovation but insists on respecting songwriters’ and artists’ rights. The music industry has long battled copyright issues, as seen during the Napster era. Now, Sony’s stance highlights that AI companies must negotiate compensation for using content in their models. It will be interesting to see how tech companies respond and if other content owners will follow Sony’s lead. One thing is certain: AI development will soon face significant IP challenges but nonetheless it will continue its assent. Do you think other content providers should follow their lead?