May Mobility’s Post

May Mobility reposted this

View profile for Edwin Olson, graphic

CEO and Co-Founder at May Mobility

Providing transportation services is a business, not a side-hustle. I think this is the biggest problem with Tesla's plan for individual car owners to have their car autonomously moonlight as robo-taxis: who wants to get into their car in the morning only to find damage or debris from last night's mayhem? This week, Sydney Lake at Fortune wrote an article on this very topic (see article link in the comments below) including Uber's Dara Khosrowshahi skepticism about the model. Sydney also included my take from May Mobility's perspective: “It’s not viable. Individual car owners don’t want to be ‘landlords’ of their car. Riders are often hard on cars—they treat them poorly, make messes, slam doors—all because the vehicle is not theirs.”

Edwin Olson

CEO and Co-Founder at May Mobility

2mo

I also think it doesn't make a lot of sense financially. If these robo-teslas are such obvious "cash printing machines", why does he need individual car owners to finance the purchase of them?

Hari Sripathi

Go to Market Operator and Transformation Expert for Consumer Industrials: New Market Entry, Pricing and International Expansion

2mo

This is what Getaround tried to do and Turo has done. The Airbnb model for cars does not work precisely for the reasons you are talking about. Here is an article I wrote many years ago. https://harisrip.online/turo-the-better-getaround/

Leanid Tsurankou

Founder & CEO @ Qibus | ex-Uber ATG | Speaker | Harvard Business EE alumni

2mo

We’ve heard similar concerns before when ridesharing first emerged—people hesitated at the thought of riding in strangers’ cars. It’s also important not to generalize. While some individuals might be sensitive to potential wear and tear, others may view it as an acceptable trade-off or even an opportunity. Platforms like Turo and Getaround show that some people are already comfortable renting out their cars, with a few even building small fleets. Ultimately, we won’t truly understand the dynamics until the model is put into practice. Until then, it remains speculation.

Like
Reply
Ammon Flores

Senior Triage Specialist | Autonomous Solutions

2mo

Thank you for sharing! My two cents: I think that one of the largest areas for failure is a lack of redundancy. What if the vehicle gets stranded? Most robotaxi companies have trailing vehicles or at least vehicles in the vicinity to come to aid or take over the vehicle manually if it is severe enough. Maybe they are planning for this and would have roadside assistance personnel dedicated to assist with such events, which would eat even more into any financial profits for Tesla.

Elliott McFadden

Greater Minnesota Shared Mobility Program Coordinator at Minnesota Department of Transportation

2mo

As someone who has operated several different kinds of shared fleets, the part that many of these tech companies leave out is accountability. You cannot not run a successful shared resource service without user accountability.

Lavell Riddle

Field Operations Manager/Lead AV Operator @ Perrone Robotics / Connect Autonomous Shuttle Lead

2mo

This is the exact scenario that people are forgetting about in this grand scenario when this is being brought up! Envisioning the grande scenario is one thing not fully understanding the full execution after implementation is another!

Like
Reply
Robert Clark

Multi-Threat: Telecoms-Cloud, Smart Transportation, Parking & Mobility, Fleet Electric/Autonomous/Digital Transformation, Outdoor Recreation & Hospitality Innovation

2mo

Agreed across the board. But some Tesla owners will consider the side gig-money for different reasons.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics