Data operations Lead at Moody's Analytics | Steering Committee member of Multicultural DE&I Group
🚨🧴 An Unexpected Encounter at the Airport: Is this Protocol Justified? 🛫 As many of you know, traveling can often be an eventful experience filled with surprises. Today, I want to share a recent incident I encountered during my visit to my hometown from Delhi. While the majority of my journey ran smoothly, a particular incident during the security check has left me feeling both perplexed and frustrated. I would love to hear your thoughts on this matter. Upon reaching the security checkpoint, I was approached by a diligent security guard who informed me that there was something suspicious in my handbag that they needed to inspect. Naturally, I complied and allowed them to examine my belongings. To my utter surprise, the guard informed me that I could not carry a small plastic body lotion on the airplane. Instead, he instructed me to place it in my checked baggage - which I had already submitted before the security check process. As I observed the situation unfold, another passenger standing next to me also caught the guard's attention. It appeared that a suspicious item in his possession was causing concern. However, to my bewilderment, when this passenger revealed a non-threatening nail cutter, the guard casually dismissed it and permitted him to board with it. This stark contrast left me baffled. How can a tiny plastic bottle of lotion be considered potentially dangerous to the airplane or its passengers, while a seemingly harmless nail cutter is deemed permissible? When I asked the guard about this discrepancy, he simply cited it as a protocol, stating that liquid items are not allowed in hand baggage. However, when I pressed further and questioned the nail cutter's legitimacy, he responded that it wasn't covered by this particular protocol, thus allowing its carriage on the airplane. This incident has left me pondering the rationale behind these airport security protocols. While I understand the importance of ensuring passenger safety, shouldn't the regulations be more logically consistent? I can't help but feel that sometimes such protocols can be unnecessarily burdensome for the public, without necessarily providing improved security measures. I am genuinely interested in hearing your opinions on this matter. Was the security guard simply adhering to standard protocol, or does this incident highlight a larger flaw or inconsistency within our security systems? I believe that it's crucial for us to engage in meaningful discussions to continuously improve the airport experience for all travelers. Let's share our thoughts and insights below! 🗣️👇 #AirportExperience #SecurityProtocol #Travels #Safety #PublicOpinion
I understand why security didn't allow body lotion, maybe because they thought it could contain alcohol and be flammable. But it's surprising they let a nail cutter through, as sharp metal objects like that aren't typically allowed in the cabin. Guess they're more afraid of lotion explosions than nail clipper ninjas! 🤔✈️😄
🛫✈️ Security procedures can be perplexing. What do you think about this experience?
Data Operation Associate 2 at Moodys Analytics | Ex-Wipro
1yHe will gift her wife😅