MONOKOTE fire protection’s Post

View organization page for MONOKOTE fire protection, graphic

2,850 followers

Good article from Adam M. Irons, CCM, PCS about intumescent fireproofing. Well written and accurate. There is one issue with it that we would like to comment on / clarify. Under "Benefits of Intumescent Fireproofing" it states that they are more space-efficient and aesthetically appealing. While beauty is in the eye of the beholder, intumescents should never be used in a confined space or applied to areas where something can impede the char growth. If you don't have enough space for a cementitious product such as MONOKOTE fire protection , you don't have enough room for an intumescent. As a industry rule you need 30 times the applied thickness of space around the protected member. #YieldProductionTrust.

Peter Scott CEng MIStructE MIFireE

Fire Protection Business Development Manager at PPG Industrial Coatings

2mo

UL 1709 is the Standard for Rapid Rise Fire Test of Protection Materials for Structural Steel which is primarily an onshore standard and is for pool fire. Jet fire would be covered with ISO 22899, however UL can issue certification based on the jet fire testing to be used with UL certified pool fire thicknesses . UL certification is for UL only and these are not interchangeable with other certification. As for expansion of PFP, ASFP TGN 13 is a recommendation in lieu of and specific derails or product information . Most manufacturers provide specific information on expansion and cladding implications based on specific products. Over-clad PFP can in some cases assist the fire resistance. Some intumescent products such as epoxy expand 4 or 6 times.

Not all products expand by thirty times it depends on where and what is required. If it is a car park you would be looking at around 5mm cementitous would require 50mm. Many car parks I have been in have the underside of the beam PFP damaged from vehicles impacting on the underside. 

Like
Reply

ASFP TGD13 STATEMENT: a minimum gap of 50 times the dry film thickness of the reactive coating is recommended to allow adequate expansion of the reactive coating in fire. For your reference. 😁

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics