National Association of Home Builders’ Post

About 23,000 single-family homes started in Q2 2024 were built-for-rent. This is almost 10% higher than in Q2 2023. Over the last year, 83,000 homes were built specifically for rent, began construction, a more than 20% increase from the previous 12 months. https://loom.ly/SCrlBSs

Builders Add Housing Supply Through Single-Family Built-for-Rent Construction

Builders Add Housing Supply Through Single-Family Built-for-Rent Construction

nahb.org

Jennifer Chevres Diaz

Realtor-Broker | Residential Sales | Client Services |CNA Certification |Elder Care

3w

It’s ok if you disagree. I won’t be offended. But I simply don’t see how Built for Rent benefits renters, nor do I see how it benefits individuals seeking to own SFR. I see how it benefits real estate investors ….yet again. This doesn’t help renters position themselves down the road to save for mortgages or increase credit scores for mortgages (unless the owners are paying extra to report to credit bureaus.) This also doesn’t add regular SFR inventory for buyers. Yes it’s good for new construction industry and investors but I’m just not seeing a long or even short term solution to the SFR affordability epidemic that is currently putting homeownership out of reach while inventory remains painfully low and values painfully high.

Michael Lai

CEO/Owner/Developer @ MLC | Real Estate Investment Expert

3w

Well said!

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics