Great article by Sophie Peel in Willamette Week about the abuse of the city's Small Donor Campaign by several of the City Council candidates contributing to each other's campaigns...!
My first reaction is that we should establish a boycott list of candidates willing to accept public matching funds in an illegal way. You can follow the links in Sophie's article, but that includes Michael Di Napoli, Chad Lykins, Sam Sachs, Theo Hathaway Saner, Thomas Shervey, and Kelly Janes. I've identified the Linkedin profiles for those candidates, so they can offer a clarifying statement.
None of the candidates were endorsed by the Revitalize Portland Coalition, so I'm comfortable shaming these folks.
My second reaction is that the city's Small Donor Program is insuring the failure of the city's dysfunctional ranked choice, multi-member district electoral system.
https://lnkd.in/gtdUJKwn
As I understand the rules, candidates can receive unlimited contributions two years in advance of the election (aka, "seed money") but cannot accept donations larger than $350 after applying to the Small Donor Program. At the same time, the program doesn't block spending by political action committees, 501(c)(4), 501(c)(5), or 501(c)(6) nonprofit organizations paying for staff time, canvassing, phone banks, list provision, etc.
The rules essentially guarantee that Mayoral and City Council candidates won't be able to buy television advertising, which in Portland has been dominated by the three Congressional races, where spending is not restricted.
Of course, the problem persists that a candidate can get elected with as little as 10% of the vote under the 60-30-10 scenario. In that situation, a well-known or incumbent candidate like Dan Ryan or Steve Novick can capture a majority of the vote and win a seat equal to a fringe candidate earning only 10% of the vote.
Voter are expected to pick their "Top Six" candidates with insufficient information about candidates. After all, we no longer have a daily newspaper... Rather than eliminating fringe candidates in a first round and allowing voters to learn more about the viable candidates, we get an instant result.
For that reason alone, voters should oppose Measure 117 in November, which seeks to extend the instant primary to federal and state elections, while keeping our closed party primary system.
And for political junkies, when will find out the results from the November 5th election for City Council...?
It would be helpful if the media outlets like KGW-TV, OPB, The Oregonian / OregonLive.com, Willamette Week, and others arranged small area voter polls, but I'm guessing that most voters won't make their 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th place choices until they fill out their voter's pamphlet.
https://lnkd.in/gDy_mFGc
THANK YOU for Go Vote NYC’s amazing leadership and support for this vital work!