Nestlé Health Science’s Post

Today a few words about GLP-1 medication which lately became so popular… and no wonder, because they give a spectacular effect in #weight_loss benefits. Just check the skinny looks of some of the Celebrities :) but please be careful because what most of the patients dont know is that GLP-1 does not provide #targeted_weight_loss. It means that this medication does not focus typically on getting rid of your fat. Instead of fat, patients loose weight in #muscle and #bone mass. What is very dangerous and unhealthy and has to be prevented. Therefore together with treatment with GLP-1 medications, special care should be taken to provide our body with an appropriate amount of protein, exercise, to stay hydrated and follow a balanced, nutrient-rich diet. Guys, for #quality_weight_loss - support yourself also with propper, #quality #supplements. GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) receptor agonists such as #semaglutide (sold under brand names like Ozempic and Wegovy), can significantly aid in weight loss through mechanisms like appetite suppression. They increase the feeling of fullness, leading to reduced food intake. They act on brain regions that regulate appetite, helping users feel satisfied with smaller portions. That causes deficiencies in #vitamins, #minerals, #protein which is essential for muscle maintenance, especially when losing weight and #calcium - essential for bones. So check your levels of #microelements and #supplement yourself in case of any deficiencies. www.pharmovit.pl/en #protein_shots #protein_powder #calcium #capsules #looking_for_partners_worldwide #distributors #collaboration #cooperation #branded_supplements #best_quality

For those new to #nutritionunlocked, this is a great introduction. Dr. Krys (Krysmarú (Krys) Araujo Torres) from our Regulatory, Scientific & Medical Affairs team interviews Dr. Jamy Ard, obesity expert. They discuss nutritional impacts and considerations for #GLP1 agonist users and prescribers. Super interesting!

Trying to wrap your head around this topic? A great podcast that covers some great insights and information

Unraveling the Truth Behind Nutrition and Chronic Disease Studies Gary Taubes dissects the challenges of observational epidemiology, critiques nutritional studies, and explores the impact of ultra-processed foods on health. Discover the truth behind associations and causality in nutrition. Video clip from this podcast conversation: https://lnkd.in/gHa5PFfD #WesternDiet #Obesity #WeightLoss #Diet #Nutrition #Diabetes #Metabolism #Health #Biology #Science #Podcast

Unveiling the Future of Nutrition: Exploring How AI Transforms Nutritional Science and Personalized Dietetics. In the ever-evolving landscape of nutritional science, the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) marks a ground-breaking shift. AI's application in this field is not just an advancement; it's a revolution. From analysing complex data in biomedical research to personalizing dietary recommendations in clinical nutrition, AI is reshaping our understanding of nutrition's role in health and disease. This transformative technology, originally conceptualized in the mid-20th century, now stands at the forefront of nutritional research, offering insights and solutions previously unattainable. https://lnkd.in/eysY7kBa #artificialintelligence #machinelearning #biomedicalresearch #epidemiology #nutrition #diet #food #healthcare #society #newsletter #kikobites #articles #sciences 📣Share, comment and subscribe!🔔 ✔We appreciate your support⚡

#Factsfri The ongoing discourse surrounding intermittent fasting and its implications for health underscores the imperative of thorough and meticulous research. The initial assertion of a heightened mortality risk underscores the intricacies inherent in nutritional epidemiology, emphasizing the importance of prudent data interpretation. As endeavors such as the EVIDENT project progress, alongside similar studies, they hold the promise of illuminating the multifaceted impacts of intermittent fasting. Such insights are pivotal for shaping evidence-based recommendations and facilitating informed discussions within the realm of public health. Ultimately, comprehending the true ramifications of intermittent fasting necessitates a balanced appraisal of emerging evidence and a steadfast commitment to scientific inquiry. I am pleased to share that my contributions on this topic were featured in The Pioneer. Given your interest in health and wellness, I believe you would find the content on my website particularly enlightening. Covering all the details of this topic including the potential benefits, diverse methodologies, and practical considerations of intermittent fasting, it aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of this trending dietary practice. Whether you are seeking foundational knowledge or exploring the latest research findings, my website offers valuable resources to navigate the intricacies of intermittent fasting. I invite you to explore its contents and delve into the fascinating world of intermittent fasting, from basic principles to advanced research insights- https://lnkd.in/d7PaExSy

As I have stated publicly for years, EATING RED MEAT IS NOT BAD FOR YOU. In this exhaustive study, published last month in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, it turns out it's actually slightly more likely that eating red meat is good for you (64%), than bad (36%), but for the most part it has no significant effect either way. I hope our health policy-makers are paying attention. "Our specification curve analysis included 1208 unique analytic specifications, of which 435 (36.0%) yielded a hazard ratio equal to or more than 1 for the effect of red meat on all-cause mortality and 773 (64.0%) less than 1. The specification curve analysis yielded a median hazard ratio of 0.94 (interquartile range: 0.83–1.05). Forty-eight specifications (3.97%) were statistically significant, 40 of which indicated unprocessed red meat to reduce all-cause mortality and eight of which indicated red meat to increase mortality." https://lnkd.in/gPp6Jx9U

Why in Nutrition Public Policy do we appear so obsessed with epidemiological studies as proof of causation, controlling TV advertising as some magic bullet to childhood obesity and trying to simplify foods as good and bad. None of this is true nutrition science. Can you really correct for other causal factors in epidemiology studies, does anyone under 40 actually watch TV and simplifying food into good and bad hasn’t worked for the last 40 years, in fact we have just doubled obesity every 10 years. We need a change in approach to interventions that are proven to work- evidence based policy not the same old policy based evidence. A nutrition traffic light labelling scheme that gives all greens to products with absolutely no nutritional value has to be wrong. For me we have to look at positive messaging around nutrient density and investigate if interventions actually work.

What We’ve Learned from the Epidemiology of Ebola Dr. Afsaneh Motamed Khorasani has drafted a summary of what we have learned from the epidemiology of Ebola so far. Evidently, with all the progress, new findings, and observations in the field of health sciences, it is on every one of us to educate and update ourselves and ask the right questions. Please feel free to read the one-page summary at your convenience. https://lnkd.in/eDFPYen8

The EAT-Lancet diet is a framework designed to promote environmental sustainability while also preventing common diseases such as type 2 diabetes. How do we know if the diet actually works?   Anna Stubbendorff, doctoral student in nutritional epidemiology at Lund University Diabetes Center, and Daniel Borch Ibsen, researcher in nutritional epidemiology at Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, have led a new study that has investigated how useful several different diet scores are at assessing adherence to this diet.   "We need reliable diet scores in order to develop evidence-based nutrition recommendations that can help prevent disease and premature death. In this study, we have used the diet scores on three population studies to determine which scores are best at evaluating adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet. The study shows that the results differ greatly depending on which score we use," says Daniel Borch Ibsen, researcher in nutritional epidemiology.   The results are published in The Lancet Planetary Health. Read more: https://lnkd.in/d4tnUPAK   📷 Photograph by Kennet Ruona #nutrition #diet #sustainability #type2diabetes