Popper's supporters argued that most criticism is based on an incomprehensible interpretation of his ideas. They argue that Popper should not be interpreted as meaning that falsifiability is a sufficient condition for the demarcation of science. Some passages seem to suggest that he considers it is only a necessary condition. Other passages would suggest that for a theory to be scientific, Popper requires (besides falsifiability) other tests, and that negative test results are accepted. A demarcation criterion based on falsifiability that includes these elements will avoid the most obvious counter-arguments of a criterion based on falsifiability alone. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30071.47527
Nicolae Sfetcu’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Doctoral Student ¦¦ Teacher ¦¦ Writer ¦¦ First Class ¦¦ Stoic philosopher ¦¦ Translator ¦¦ Phonologist ¦¦ Spanish Enthusiast ¦¦ Text Editor
https://lnkd.in/djDWP2m5. Paper alert 💡 Title: The fundamental assumption of Classical phonemics, and challenges. This paper contributes to the literature by discussing the implications of classical phonemics' limitations on our understanding of morphological processes and phonemic interchange.
-
👻 Read some spooky science! The research in this paper illustrates the importance of local and Indigenous observations along the roads for monitoring and understanding wildfires, including “zombie fires”. Now available in the Canadian Journal of Zombie Science 🔥🧟♀️ https://ow.ly/SR7050TSUGh
-
-
Cognitive neuroscientist specializing in sleep, memory and neurodegeneration. Group Leader at UPD Bern.
🎇 I'm getting academically "attacked"? How exciting! In a recent Discussion Article, Steinkrauss & Slotnick (https://lnkd.in/eQ6z2mbG) argue that existing studies on hippocampal involvement in implicit memory are all biased and not convincing. One of those studies was my dissertation project (https://lnkd.in/egyrSihB) I was invited to comment, which I did: https://lnkd.in/ee98M2Cx I believe their critique falls into special pleading, but this is what the scientific process is all about: claim, challenge, and defend. Dive into both sides and see what you think!
-
🌳✨ Delve into the mysteries of Hoia Baciu Forest! Our paper explores 👻 the paranormal phenomena, 🧠 scientific investigations, and 📜 cultural interpretations surrounding one of the world's most haunted locations! #SupernaturalScience 📚🔍 https://lnkd.in/gWvdbw8d
-
-
A (The?) leader in the alignment of Torah testimony, science and ancient civilization. Including: Cosmology and Torah Chronology. Composer of the 'Moshe Emes' series.
Pearlman YeC alignment of Torah testimony, science and ancient civ. is still gaining momentum. This paper on how radio-metric dating aligns best withing Torah narrative and chronology (5784 anno-mundi to date) vs the inflated current consensus. Follow, recommend and share at ResearchGate to help advance science and correct the history books.
Roger M. Pearlman Yec | Achievement
researchgate.net
-
I would like to share that our paper related to the project on fault location in distribution networks using artificial intelligence, in collaboration with Professor Da Silva from Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, and Professor Monteiro from the Polytechnic University of Lisbon, has been successfully published in the e-Prime journal.
-
-
If you want more influence, the science of persuasion can make it happen 🧠 Swipe to learn about Cialidini’s 6 Principles of Influence which our Head of Behavourial Science, Paulina, uses in her work 👀 https://lnkd.in/eV7mnkUU
-
How does science affect regional technological diversification? In this paper with Alessandra Scandura just out in the JoEG, we investigate academic inventors' direct and moderating role. Check it out! https://shorturl.at/SVvIo
-
-
Why does time appear to flow in one direction, a.k.a. Arrow of Time? Explained in new paper "Demystifying Arrow of Time" (it’s free): https://lnkd.in/euCZJEnJ Scientific discussions of Arrow of Time deal w/ highly complex systems & get confusing. Popular literature tends to regurgitate distorted messages. This paper strips off unnecessary complexities & provides simple examples unveiling root cause of apparent Arrow of Time.
-
Why does time appear to flow in one direction, a.k.a. Arrow of Time? Explained in new paper "Demystifying Arrow of Time" (it’s free): https://lnkd.in/eXkh2RBS Scientific discussions of Arrow of Time deal w/ highly complex systems & get confusing. Popular literature tends to regurgitate distorted messages. This paper strips off unnecessary complexities & provides simple examples unveiling root cause of apparent Arrow of Time.
