Peepal Baba’s Post

Transcript

If I have a A, you know, my personal choice would be to I can, I can. You know, I can compromise on the quality of the work or I would say efficiency, efficiency of an employee, but I would like to see an employee with good attitude, good attitude. Other if he has a bad attitude, he or she has a bad attitude and is a very good with his work. That his or her book is very efficient is very but has a bad attitude. What will you do with it? He or she will create problems for you. Would team may be problem create crying woe organization. Coby found you know it's a kind of pollution. So toxic hojata puram Mahal of his car. So it's better to have nice positive, pleasant cheerful people around you. So take 100K scale. Pay 100 company hoga to 959590 or 90 hoja they can hogatha Singh pleasantly to hoga comes second without stress to hoga. So Agar toxic employees hung Agar bad attitude just couple them bad attitude. That employee compared to definitely if I think in the long run the work efficiency basis suffer condition. So it is better that always take employees with good attitude, cheerful, pleasant. I would use the word pleasant. You know, if the employees are pleasant and disposition. Hyunjoo presence here who Kisiko Nahin. Kisiko Harmonika revoke Seiko disturbed. So I think it is good to have good human beings in the organization, good human beings in the office, rather than you know, with high qualifications and high efficiency. And I would personally. Love to have pleasant people in the office.